Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of analgesia after upper extremity surgery in children
with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks.
Subjects-methods: 54 pediatric patients undergoing upper extremity surgery, eligible for
selection, were randomly assigned to 2 groups: General anesthesia with ultrasound-guided brachial
plexus blocks (group I) or general anesthesia (group II).
Results: Showed that Ramsay's sedation score after surgery: Group I had 100% of patients
achieved ≤3, group II had 85.18% achieved ≤ 3 and 14.82% patients achieved 4 points (p<0.05);
average pain relief time in group I 7.13 ± 0.64 hours; average post-operative recovery time in
group I7.85±2.35, group II 13.70±2.65, (p<0.05); the number of times of using additional pain
relief after surgery of group I was 1.30 ± 0.47, and of group II was 3.26 ± 0.59, (p<0.05).
Conclusions: Postoperative analgesia was better than anesthesia alone with: better postoperative Ramsay sedation score, better recovery time, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and
additional use of postoperative analgesia. significantly less than in pediatric patients receiving
anaesthesia alone.
ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANALGESIA AFTER UPPER EXTREMITY SURGERY IN CHILDREN WITH ULTRASOUND-GUIDED BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCKS AT NGHE AN OBSTETRIC AND PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL FROM 02/2022 TO 10/2022
18
Views
0
Downloads
Keywords
Supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks, ultrasound-guided, analgesia, children.
Abstract
References
[1]
Suresh S., Sawardekar A., Shah R.,
Google Scholar
[2]
Ultrasound for regional anesthesia in children.
Google Scholar
[3]
Anesthesiol Clin, 32(1), 263–279, 2014.
Google Scholar
[4]
Gabriel RA, Swisher MW, Sztain JF et
Google Scholar
[5]
al., State of the art opioid-sparing strategies for
Google Scholar
[6]
post-operative pain in adult surgical patients.
Google Scholar
[7]
Expert Opin Pharmacother, 20(8), 949–961,
Google Scholar
[8]
Zadrazil M., Opfermann P., Marhofer P.
Google Scholar
[9]
et al., Brachial plexus block with ultrasound
Google Scholar
[10]
guidance for upper-limb trauma surgery in
Google Scholar
[11]
children: a retrospective cohort study of 565
Google Scholar
[12]
cases. Br J Anaesth, 125(1), 104–109, 2020.
Google Scholar
[13]
Zhang L., Pang R., Zhang L., Comparison
Google Scholar
[14]
of ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and
Google Scholar
[15]
supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper
Google Scholar
[16]
extremity surgery: a propensity score matched
Google Scholar
[17]
retrospective cohort study. Ann Palliat Med,
Google Scholar
[18]
(1), 454–461, 2021.
Google Scholar
[19]
Chen L., Shen Y., Liu S. et al., Minimum
Google Scholar
[20]
effective volume of 0.2% ropivacaine for
Google Scholar
[21]
ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus
Google Scholar
[22]
block in preschool-age children. Sci Rep, 11(1),
Google Scholar
[23]
, 2021.
Google Scholar
[24]
Gao Y., Dai P., Shi L. et al., Effects of
Google Scholar
[25]
ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block
Google Scholar
[26]
combined with laryngeal mask sevoflurane
Google Scholar
[27]
general anesthesia on inflammation and stress
Google Scholar
[28]
response in children undergoing upper limb
Google Scholar
[29]
fracture surgery. Minerva Pediatr (Torino),
Google Scholar
[30]
De José María B., Banús E., Navarro
Google Scholar
[31]
Egea M. et al., Ultrasound-guided
Google Scholar
[32]
supraclavicular vs infraclavicular brachial
Google Scholar
[33]
plexus blocks in children. Paediatr Anaesth,
Google Scholar
[34]
(9), 838–844, 2008.
Google Scholar
[35]
Amiri HR, Espandar R., Upper extremity
Google Scholar
[36]
surgery in younger children under ultrasoundguided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a
Google Scholar
[37]
case series. J Child Orthop, 4(4), 315–319,
Google Scholar