Articles Vol. 63 No. chuyên đề 2-HN Y học Giới tính (2022) 18/11/2022

SPERM COLLECTION BY MICRO TESE METHOD IN PATIENTS WITH NONOBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA AND SOME RELATED FACTORS

Quach Thi Yen1,2, Trinh Quoc Thanh3,4, Doan Minh Thuy1,2, Vu Thi Hao5,6, Nguyen Huyen Trang1,2, Hoang Phuc Toan1,2, Ha Quy Anh1,2
1 Vietnam University of Traditional Medicine
2 Học viện Y Dược học Cổ truyền Việt Nam
3 Vietnam Military Medical University
4 Học viện Quân y
5 Thai Nguyen University of Medicine and Pharmacy
6 Đại học Y Dược Thái Nguyên
Corresponding author: doanminhthuyvn@yahoo.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v63i7.494
23 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Question: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro tese) is a highly effective
method of sperm collection with a low risk of secondary testicular damage. Objectives: To
evaluate the sperm collection rate by microtese method in patients with nonobstructive
azoospermia (NOA) and some related factors. Subjects and research methods: 132
NOA patients were micro-tese made at the Military Clinical Embryo Institute - Vietnam
Military Medical University from 5/2017 to 12/2019. Results: The sperm collection
rate was 40.15%. There was no association between age, BMI, duration of infertility,
AZF with sperm collection rate. There was a relationship between testicular volume,
hormone concentration, histopathology, and sperm collection rate. The cut-off point of
the right and left testicular volumes were 5.5mL, with a sensitivity of 86.3% and 84.3%,
specificity of 50.6% and 51.9%, and a curve area of 0.707, respectively and 0.676 (p <
0.001 and p < 0.01). The cut-off points of FSH, LH and testosterone were 13.41mIU/
mL, 7.64mIU/mL and 3.02ng/mL, respectively, with a sensitivity of 74.4%; 69.9%;
86.8%, specificity 58.5%; 56.6%; 46.8% and the corresponding curve area was 0.666;
0.625; 0.647. Conclusion: Although the relationship between testicular volume, FSH,
LH, testosterone levels, and histopathology with microtese sperm collection rate in NOA
patients was found, the prognostic value was low.

References
[1]
Vu Nhat Khang, Dang Quang Vinh, Google Scholar
[2]
Azoospermia: Classification and Treatment. Google Scholar
[3]
In: Nguyen Thi Ngoc Phuong. Reproductive Google Scholar
[4]
Hormones, 2, 363-369. Medical Publishing Google Scholar
[5]
House, Hanoi, 2013. Google Scholar
[6]
World Health Organization, Collection and Google Scholar
[7]
examination of human semen. In: Laboratory Google Scholar
[8]
manual for the examination and processing Google Scholar
[9]
of human semen, 4th ed, pp.9. Cambridge Google Scholar
[10]
University Press, Cambridge, 2010. Google Scholar
[11]
Ishikawa T, Surgical recovery of sperm in Google Scholar
[12]
non-obstructive azoospermia. Asian Journal Google Scholar
[13]
of Andrology, 14(1):109–115, 2012. Google Scholar
[14]
Deruyver Y, Vanderschueren D, Van der Google Scholar
[15]
Aa F, Outcome of microdissection TESE Google Scholar
[16]
compared with conventional TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic Google Scholar
[17]
review. Andrology, 2(1):20–24, 2014. Google Scholar
[18]
Pavan-Jukic D, Stubljar D, Jukic T et al., Google Scholar
[19]
Predictive factors for sperm retrieval from Google Scholar
[20]
males with azoospermia who are eligible for Google Scholar
[21]
testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Systems Google Scholar
[22]
Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 1–6, 2019. Google Scholar
[23]
Karamazak S, Kızılay F, Bahçeci T et al., Google Scholar
[24]
Do body mass index, hormone profile and Google Scholar
[25]
testicular volume effect sperm retrieval rates of Google Scholar
[26]
microsurgical sperm extraction in the patients Google Scholar
[27]
with nonobstructive azoospermia? Turkish Google Scholar
[28]
Journal of Urolory, 44(3):202–207, 2018. Google Scholar
[29]
Iwatsuki S, Sasaki S, Taguchi K et al., Effect Google Scholar
[30]
of obesity on sperm retrieval outcome and Google Scholar
[31]
reproductive hormone levels in Japanese Google Scholar
[32]
azoospermic men with and without Google Scholar
[33]
Klinefelter syndrome. Andrology, 5(1):82– Google Scholar
[34]
[35]
Cetinkaya M, Önem K, Zorba OU et al., Google Scholar
[36]
Evaluation of Microdissection Testicular Google Scholar
[37]
Sperm Extraction Results in Patients with Google Scholar
[38]
Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Independent Google Scholar
[39]
Predictive Factors and Best Cutoff Values for Google Scholar
[40]
Sperm Retrieval, 12(6):2436–2442, 2015. Google Scholar
[41]
Li H, Chen LP, Yang J et al., Predictive Google Scholar
[42]
value of FSH, testicular volume, and Google Scholar
[43]
histopathological findings for the sperm Google Scholar
[44]
retrieval rate of microdissection TESE Google Scholar
[45]
in nonobstructive azoospermia: a metaanalysis. Asian Journal of Andrology, Google Scholar
[46]
(1):30, 2018. Google Scholar
[47]
Mitchell V, Robin G, Boitrelle F et al., Google Scholar
[48]
Correlation between testicular sperm Google Scholar
[49]
extraction outcomes and clinical, endocrine Google Scholar
[50]
and testicular histology parameters in Google Scholar
[51]
azoospermic men with normal serum Google Scholar
[52]
FSH levels: Normal serum FSH level and Google Scholar
[53]
sperm extraction. International Journal of Google Scholar
[54]
Andrology, 34(4pt1):299–305, 2011. Google Scholar
[55]
Guneri C, Alkibay T, Tunc L, Effects Google Scholar
[56]
of clinical, laboratuary and pathological Google Scholar
[57]
features on successful sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia. Turkish Journal of Google Scholar
[58]
Urology, 42(3):168–177, 2016. Google Scholar
[59]
Klami R, Mankonen H, Perheentupa A, Google Scholar
[60]
Successful microdissection testicular sperm Google Scholar
[61]
extraction for men with non-obstructive Google Scholar
[62]
azoospermia. Reproductive Biology, Google Scholar
[63]
(2):137–142, 2018. Google Scholar
[64]
Wosnitzer M, Goldstein M, Hardy MP, Google Scholar
[65]
Review of Azoospermia. Spermatogenesis, Google Scholar
[66]
(1):1–8, 2014. Google Scholar
[67]
Dabaja AA, Schlegel PN, Microdissection Google Scholar
[68]
testicular sperm extraction: an update. Asian Google Scholar
[69]
Journal of Andrology, 15(1):35–39, 2013. Google Scholar