Question: Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro tese) is a highly effective
method of sperm collection with a low risk of secondary testicular damage. Objectives: To
evaluate the sperm collection rate by microtese method in patients with nonobstructive
azoospermia (NOA) and some related factors. Subjects and research methods: 132
NOA patients were micro-tese made at the Military Clinical Embryo Institute - Vietnam
Military Medical University from 5/2017 to 12/2019. Results: The sperm collection
rate was 40.15%. There was no association between age, BMI, duration of infertility,
AZF with sperm collection rate. There was a relationship between testicular volume,
hormone concentration, histopathology, and sperm collection rate. The cut-off point of
the right and left testicular volumes were 5.5mL, with a sensitivity of 86.3% and 84.3%,
specificity of 50.6% and 51.9%, and a curve area of 0.707, respectively and 0.676 (p <
0.001 and p < 0.01). The cut-off points of FSH, LH and testosterone were 13.41mIU/
mL, 7.64mIU/mL and 3.02ng/mL, respectively, with a sensitivity of 74.4%; 69.9%;
86.8%, specificity 58.5%; 56.6%; 46.8% and the corresponding curve area was 0.666;
0.625; 0.647. Conclusion: Although the relationship between testicular volume, FSH,
LH, testosterone levels, and histopathology with microtese sperm collection rate in NOA
patients was found, the prognostic value was low.
SPERM COLLECTION BY MICRO TESE METHOD IN PATIENTS WITH NONOBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA AND SOME RELATED FACTORS
23
Views
0
Downloads
Keywords
Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro tese); Non-obstructive azoospermia; sperm collection.
Abstract
References
[1]
Vu Nhat Khang, Dang Quang Vinh,
Google Scholar
[2]
Azoospermia: Classification and Treatment.
Google Scholar
[3]
In: Nguyen Thi Ngoc Phuong. Reproductive
Google Scholar
[4]
Hormones, 2, 363-369. Medical Publishing
Google Scholar
[5]
House, Hanoi, 2013.
Google Scholar
[6]
World Health Organization, Collection and
Google Scholar
[7]
examination of human semen. In: Laboratory
Google Scholar
[8]
manual for the examination and processing
Google Scholar
[9]
of human semen, 4th ed, pp.9. Cambridge
Google Scholar
[10]
University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
Google Scholar
[11]
Ishikawa T, Surgical recovery of sperm in
Google Scholar
[12]
non-obstructive azoospermia. Asian Journal
Google Scholar
[13]
of Andrology, 14(1):109–115, 2012.
Google Scholar
[14]
Deruyver Y, Vanderschueren D, Van der
Google Scholar
[15]
Aa F, Outcome of microdissection TESE
Google Scholar
[16]
compared with conventional TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic
Google Scholar
[17]
review. Andrology, 2(1):20–24, 2014.
Google Scholar
[18]
Pavan-Jukic D, Stubljar D, Jukic T et al.,
Google Scholar
[19]
Predictive factors for sperm retrieval from
Google Scholar
[20]
males with azoospermia who are eligible for
Google Scholar
[21]
testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Systems
Google Scholar
[22]
Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 1–6, 2019.
Google Scholar
[23]
Karamazak S, Kızılay F, Bahçeci T et al.,
Google Scholar
[24]
Do body mass index, hormone profile and
Google Scholar
[25]
testicular volume effect sperm retrieval rates of
Google Scholar
[26]
microsurgical sperm extraction in the patients
Google Scholar
[27]
with nonobstructive azoospermia? Turkish
Google Scholar
[28]
Journal of Urolory, 44(3):202–207, 2018.
Google Scholar
[29]
Iwatsuki S, Sasaki S, Taguchi K et al., Effect
Google Scholar
[30]
of obesity on sperm retrieval outcome and
Google Scholar
[31]
reproductive hormone levels in Japanese
Google Scholar
[32]
azoospermic men with and without
Google Scholar
[33]
Klinefelter syndrome. Andrology, 5(1):82–
Google Scholar
[34]
, 2017.
Google Scholar
[35]
Cetinkaya M, Önem K, Zorba OU et al.,
Google Scholar
[36]
Evaluation of Microdissection Testicular
Google Scholar
[37]
Sperm Extraction Results in Patients with
Google Scholar
[38]
Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Independent
Google Scholar
[39]
Predictive Factors and Best Cutoff Values for
Google Scholar
[40]
Sperm Retrieval, 12(6):2436–2442, 2015.
Google Scholar
[41]
Li H, Chen LP, Yang J et al., Predictive
Google Scholar
[42]
value of FSH, testicular volume, and
Google Scholar
[43]
histopathological findings for the sperm
Google Scholar
[44]
retrieval rate of microdissection TESE
Google Scholar
[45]
in nonobstructive azoospermia: a metaanalysis. Asian Journal of Andrology,
Google Scholar
[46]
(1):30, 2018.
Google Scholar
[47]
Mitchell V, Robin G, Boitrelle F et al.,
Google Scholar
[48]
Correlation between testicular sperm
Google Scholar
[49]
extraction outcomes and clinical, endocrine
Google Scholar
[50]
and testicular histology parameters in
Google Scholar
[51]
azoospermic men with normal serum
Google Scholar
[52]
FSH levels: Normal serum FSH level and
Google Scholar
[53]
sperm extraction. International Journal of
Google Scholar
[54]
Andrology, 34(4pt1):299–305, 2011.
Google Scholar
[55]
Guneri C, Alkibay T, Tunc L, Effects
Google Scholar
[56]
of clinical, laboratuary and pathological
Google Scholar
[57]
features on successful sperm retrieval in nonobstructive azoospermia. Turkish Journal of
Google Scholar
[58]
Urology, 42(3):168–177, 2016.
Google Scholar
[59]
Klami R, Mankonen H, Perheentupa A,
Google Scholar
[60]
Successful microdissection testicular sperm
Google Scholar
[61]
extraction for men with non-obstructive
Google Scholar
[62]
azoospermia. Reproductive Biology,
Google Scholar
[63]
(2):137–142, 2018.
Google Scholar
[64]
Wosnitzer M, Goldstein M, Hardy MP,
Google Scholar
[65]
Review of Azoospermia. Spermatogenesis,
Google Scholar
[66]
(1):1–8, 2014.
Google Scholar
[67]
Dabaja AA, Schlegel PN, Microdissection
Google Scholar
[68]
testicular sperm extraction: an update. Asian
Google Scholar
[69]
Journal of Andrology, 15(1):35–39, 2013.
Google Scholar