Articles Vol. 63 No. chuyên đề 2-HN Y học Giới tính (2022) 18/11/2022

SEVERAL FACTORS AFFECT THE SPERM QUALITY OF VIETNAMESE MEN

Bui The Bun1,2, Bui Canh Vin3,4, Nguyen Hoai Bac5,6
1 Vinmec International Hospital
2 Bệnh viện đa khoa quốc tế Vinmec Times City
3 Duc Phuc Hospital
4 Bệnh viện Đức Phúc
5 Hanoi Medical University Hospital
6 Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v63i7.493
33 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Background and Aims: Several studies have shown an association between age and BMI
with semen quality, but results have been inconsistent. In Vietnam, there is no research on
this issue. We carried out this study to investigate the relationship between age and BMI
with the semen quality of Vietnamese men.
Methods: The cross-sectional descriptive study includes 1144 semen samples collected over
five years, from January 2017 to December 2021.
Results: The 46-60-year-old group had significantly lower semen volume, total sperm count,
and normal sperm ratio than the 16-30 and 31-45-year-old groups. The high BMI group
was associated with lower semen volume and total sperm count than the other groups. The
relationship between the low BMI group and semen parameters is not clear.
Conclusion: Aging decreased semen volume, total sperm count, and normal sperm ratio in
patients. High BMI decreased semen volume and total sperm count but reduced progressive
motility in patients.

References
[1]
World Health Organization, UNDP/ Google Scholar
[2]
UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Google Scholar
[3]
Special Programme of Research D and RT Google Scholar
[4]
in HR. HRP Annual Report 2021. World Google Scholar
[5]
Health Organization; 2022. Accessed Google Scholar
[7]
handle/10665/358892 Google Scholar
[8]
A healthy lifestyle - WHO recommendations. Google Scholar
[9]
Accessed November 9, 2022. https://www. Google Scholar
[10]
who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/ Google Scholar
[11]
a-healthy-lifestyle---who-recommendations Google Scholar
[12]
Ma J, Wu L, Zhou Y et al., Association Google Scholar
[13]
between BMI and semen quality: an Google Scholar
[14]
observational study of 3966 sperm donors. Google Scholar
[15]
Hum Reprod. 2019;34(1):155-162. Google Scholar
[16]
doi:10.1093/humrep/dey328 Google Scholar
[17]
Wang EY, Huang Y, Du QY et al., Body mass Google Scholar
[18]
index effects sperm quality: a retrospective Google Scholar
[19]
study in Northern China. Asian J Androl. Google Scholar
[20]
;19(2):234-237. doi:10.4103/1008- Google Scholar
[21]
[22]
Chavarro JE, Toth TL, Wright DL et al., Google Scholar
[23]
Body mass index in relation to semen Google Scholar
[24]
quality, sperm DNA integrity and serum Google Scholar
[25]
reproductive hormone levels among men Google Scholar
[26]
attending an infertility clinic. Fertil Steril. Google Scholar
[27]
;93(7):2222-2231. doi:10.1016/j. Google Scholar
[28]
fertnstert.2009.01.100 Google Scholar
[29]
MacDonald AA, Herbison GP, Showell M et Google Scholar
[30]
al., The impact of body mass index on semen Google Scholar
[31]
parameters and reproductive hormones Google Scholar
[32]
in human males: a systematic review Google Scholar
[33]
with meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. Google Scholar
[34]
;16(3):293-311. doi:10.1093/humupd/ Google Scholar
[35]
[36]
Thomsen L, Humaidan P, Bungum L et al., Google Scholar
[37]
The impact of male overweight on semen Google Scholar
[38]
quality and outcome of assisted reproduction. Google Scholar
[39]
Asian J Androl. 2014;16(5):749-754. Google Scholar
[40]
doi:10.4103/1008-682X.125398 Google Scholar
[41]
Curley JP, Mashoodh R, Champagne FA, Google Scholar
[42]
Epigenetics and the Origins of Paternal Google Scholar
[43]
Effects. Horm Behav. 2011;59(3):306-314. Google Scholar
[44]
doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.06.018 Google Scholar
[45]
Reichman NE, Teitler JO, Paternal Age Google Scholar
[46]
as a Risk Factor for Low Birthweight. Google Scholar
[47]
Am J Public Health. 2006;96(5):862-866. Google Scholar
[48]
doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.066324 Google Scholar
[49]
Moskovtsev SI, Willis J, Mullen JBM, Agerelated decline in sperm deoxyribonucleic Google Scholar
[50]
acid integrity in patients evaluated for male Google Scholar
[51]
infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(2):496-499. Google Scholar
[52]
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.075 Google Scholar
[53]
Stone BA, Alex A, Werlin LB et al., Age Google Scholar
[54]
thresholds for changes in semen parameters Google Scholar
[55]
in men. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):952-958. Google Scholar
[56]
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.046 Google Scholar
[57]
Johnson SL, Dunleavy J, Gemmell NJ et al., Google Scholar
[58]
Consistent age-dependent declines in human Google Scholar
[59]
semen quality: a systematic review and Google Scholar
[60]
meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;19:22- Google Scholar
[61]
doi:10.1016/j.arr.2014.10.007 Google Scholar
[62]
Collodel G, Ferretti F, Masini M et al., Google Scholar
[63]
Influence of age on sperm characteristics Google Scholar
[64]
evaluated by light and electron microscopies. Google Scholar
[65]
Sci Rep. 2021;11:4989. doi:10.1038/s41598- Google Scholar
[66]
[67]
Hammiche F, Laven JSE, Twigt JM et al., Google Scholar
[68]
Body mass index and central adiposity Google Scholar
[69]
are associated with sperm quality in Google Scholar
[70]
men of subfertile couples. Hum Reprod. Google Scholar
[71]
;27(8):2365-2372. doi:10.1093/ Google Scholar
[72]
humrep/des177 Google Scholar
[73]
Sekhavat L, Moein MR, The effect of male Google Scholar
[74]
body mass index on sperm parameters. Google Scholar
[75]
Aging Male. 2010;13(3):155-158. Google Scholar
[76]
doi:10.3109/13685530903536643 Google Scholar
[77]
Eisenberg ML, Kim S, Chen Z et al., Google Scholar
[78]
The relationship between male BMI and Google Scholar
[79]
waist circumference on semen quality: Google Scholar
[80]
data from the LIFE study. Hum Reprod. Google Scholar
[81]
;29(2):193-200. doi:10.1093/humrep/ Google Scholar
[82]
[83]
Qin DD, Yuan W, Zhou WJ et al., Do Google Scholar
[84]
reproductive hormones explain the Google Scholar
[85]
association between body mass index Google Scholar
[86]
and semen quality? Asian J Androl. Google Scholar
[87]
;9(6):827-834. doi:10.1111/j.1745- Google Scholar
[88]
2007.00268.x Google Scholar