Objectives: To describe the characteristics of the seminiferous tubules and the relationship to
sperm collection by micro-TESE (Microdissection testicular sperm extraction - micro TESE)
in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). Subjects and research methods: 132
NOA patients were performed micro TESE at the Military Clinical Embryo Institute - Vietnam
Military Medical University from 5/2017 to 12/2019. Results: Histopathology of 132 NOA
patients showed that the rate of hypospermatogenesis (HP), maturation arrest (MA), Sertoli
cell only syndrome (SCOS) and hyalinization was 8.33%, 20.45%, 59.85%, and 11.36%,
respectively. The diameter of the seminiferous tubules in patients with NOA was smaller
than the normal value, in which the fibrous sheath thickness was thicker. The epithelial
cells reduced severely. The percentage of patients with sperm collection was 40.15%. The
probability of finding spermatozoa in patients with normal seminiferous tubule diameter and
fibrous sheath thickness was 5.58 times and 6.20 times compared with patients out of the
normal values. The probability of finding spermatozoa in patients with Johnsen score ≥ 8
was 6.66 times higher than that in patients with Johnsen score < 8. Conclusion: There was a
difference in characteristics of the seminiferous tubules in NOA patients compared with the
normal value. Histopathology is one of the factors predicting the success of the micro TESE
method. There was a relationship between seminiferous tubule diameter, fibrous sheath
thickness and Johnsen score to sperm collection rate in NOA patients.
VAS DEFERENS CHARACTERISTIC AND RELATED FACTORS TO SPERM COLLECTING BY MICROTESE IN PATIENTS WITH NON OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA
14
Views
0
Downloads
Keywords
Microsurgical method to collect sperm from testicles; Non-obstruction azoospermia; Sperm collection; testicular histology.
Abstract
References
[1]
Phương NTN, Reproductive endology,
Google Scholar
[2]
Medical Publishing House, Hanoi, 2013.
Google Scholar
[3]
World Health Organization, Laboratory
Google Scholar
[4]
manual for the examination and processing
Google Scholar
[5]
of human semen, Cambridge University
Google Scholar
[6]
Press, Cambridge, 2010.
Google Scholar
[7]
Ishikawa T, Surgical recovery of sperm
Google Scholar
[8]
in non-obstructive azoospermia. Asian J
Google Scholar
[9]
Androl, 14(1), 109–115, 2012.
Google Scholar
[10]
Deruyver Y, Vanderschueren D, Van der
Google Scholar
[11]
Aa F, Outcome of microdissection TESE
Google Scholar
[12]
compared with conventional TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic
Google Scholar
[13]
review. Andrology, 2(1), 20–24, 2014.
Google Scholar
[14]
Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Nagy P et al., Are
Google Scholar
[15]
there any predictive factors for successful
Google Scholar
[16]
testicular sperm recovery in azoospermic
Google Scholar
[17]
patients? Hum Reprod, 12(1), 80–86, 1997.
Google Scholar
[18]
Wosnitzer M, Goldstein M, Hardy MP,
Google Scholar
[19]
Review of Azoospermia. Spermatogenesis,
Google Scholar
[20]
(1), 1–8, 2014.
Google Scholar
[21]
Klami R, Mankonen H, Perheentupa A,
Google Scholar
[22]
Successful microdissection testicular sperm
Google Scholar
[23]
extraction for men with non-obstructive
Google Scholar
[24]
azoospermia. Reproductive Biology, 18(2),
Google Scholar
[25]
–142, 2018.
Google Scholar