Articles Vol. 63 No. chuyên đề 2-HN Y học Giới tính (2022) 18/11/2022

OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS AFTER TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY IN 2016-2022 AT HOAN MY CUU LONG HOSPITAL

Nguyen Duc Duy1,2, Pham Thanh Khoai1,2, Tran Huu Thien1,2, Tran chi Thien1,2
1 Hoan My Cuu Long Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Hoàn Mỹ Cửu Long
Corresponding author: duy.nguyen@hoanmy.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v63i7.481
23 Views
0 Downloads
Keywords
Prostate cancer, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.
Abstract

Objectives: The transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy protocols have been
an optimizing strategy for diagnosis of prostate cancer. In this study, we aim to examine the
cancer detection rate and the complications following prostate biopsy at Hoan My Cuu Long
Hospital.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical data of patients who underwent TRUSguided prostate biopsy in 12/2016 to 08/2022 at our institution. The pathological outcomes,
major complications were recorded and assessed clinically.
Results: In this study, 129 patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy were
enrolled. The mean age was 73,33 years. The complications were infrequent, hematospermia
in 13 patients (10.1%). Overall, 40 patients (31%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer.
Conclutions: Our study demonstrated the cancer detection rate, and type of complications
following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.

References
[1]
Carter HB, Partin AW, Diagnosis and staging Google Scholar
[2]
of prostate cancer, Campbell’s urology, Google Scholar
[3]
;11th, 2461-2468. Google Scholar
[4]
Matlaga BR, Eskew LA, Mc Cullough DL, Google Scholar
[5]
Prostate biopsy: Indications and technique, Google Scholar
[6]
Jurol, 2002; 12-19. Google Scholar
[7]
M. Minhaj Siddiqui, Soroush Rais-Bahrami, Google Scholar
[8]
Comparison of UR/Ultrasound FusionGuided Biopsy with Ultrasound-Guided Google Scholar
[9]
Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate cancer, Google Scholar
[10]
JAMA, 2015; 313(4): 390-397. Google Scholar
[11]
Norberg M, Egevad L, Holemberg L et al., Google Scholar
[12]
The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided Google Scholar
[13]
core biopsy of the prostate underestimates Google Scholar
[14]
the presence of cancer, Urology, 1997; Google Scholar
[15]
-566. Google Scholar
[16]
Hodge KK, McNeal, Random systematic Google Scholar
[17]
versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal Google Scholar
[18]
core biopsies of the prostate, Journal of Google Scholar
[19]
Urology, 1989; 71-75. Google Scholar
[20]
Jennifer LY, Micheal AL, Richard JS, Sepsis Google Scholar
[21]
due to Fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia Google Scholar
[22]
Coli after transrectal Ultrasound-guided Google Scholar
[23]
Prostate Needle Biopsy, Jurol, 2009; 74: Google Scholar
[24]
-339. Google Scholar
[25]
Rifkin MD, Biopsy techniques. Ultrasound Google Scholar
[26]
of the prostate: Imaging, Campbells urology, Google Scholar
[27]
; 11th. Google Scholar
[28]
Đỗ Anh Toàn, Nguyễn Ngọc Thái và CS, Google Scholar
[29]
OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS Google Scholar
[30]
AFTER TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUNDGUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY IN 2018 Google Scholar
[31]
AT BINH DAN HOSPITAL, 2009; (3): Google Scholar
[32]
-279. Google Scholar
[33]
Vũ Văn Ty, Trà Anh Duy và cs, Google Scholar
[34]
COMPARISION OUTCOMES OF 6 Google Scholar
[35]
VERSUS 12 CORE PROSTATE BIOPSY Google Scholar
[36]
UNDER TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND Google Scholar
[37]
GUIDE, 2012; 3(16): 229-304. Google Scholar