Articles Vol. 63 No. chuyên đề 2-HN Y học Giới tính (2022) 18/11/2022

STUDY OF CLINICAL, SUBCLINICAL AND EVALUATION OUTCOMES OF BILATERAL SCROTO-INGUINAL MICROSURGICAL VARICOCELECTOMY AT CAN THO CENTER GENERAL HOSPITAL

Vo Hoang Tam1,2, Pham Van Linh3,4, Du Thi Ngoc Thu5,6, Nguyen Phuoc Loc1,2, Truong Cong Thanh1,2, Dam Van Cuong7,8
1 Can Tho Central General Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Trung ương Cần Thơ
3 Hong Bang International University
4 Trường Đại học Quốc tế Hồng Bàng
5 Cho Ray Hospital
6 Bệnh viện Chợ Rẫy
7 Nam Can Tho University Medical Center
8 Bệnh viện Đại học Nam Cần Thơ
Corresponding author: drvohoangtam@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v63i7.479
18 Views
0 Downloads
Keywords
Varicocele, scrotal pain, male infertility, microsurgical varicoceletomy.
Abstract

Background: Varicocele is by far the most commonly performed operation for the treatment
of male infertility. Varicocele is found in approximately 15% of the general population, 35%
of men with primary infertility, and 75% to 81% of men with secondary infertility. Methods:
A prospective and retrospective clinical descriptive study of 32 patients with varicocele who
were diagnosed and treated by microsurgical varicoceletomy at Can Tho Central General
Hospital from March 2015 to July 2019. Results: Symtoms: scrotal paint 59,4%, infertility
31,3%, scrotal paint and infertility 9,4%. Left scrotal pain 86,4%, both scrotal pain 13,6%.
Varicocele grade III 71,9% and grade II 28,1%. Scrotal untrasound detected 75% cases.
77,3% complete resolution of pain, 22,7% a partial resolution of pain. Natural pregnancy rate
53,8%. There were neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications. Conclusions:
Varicocele’s diagnosis depends on clinical. Microsurgical varicoceletomy is a safe, effective
approach in treatment scrotal pain and infertility.

References
[1]
Altunoluk B, Soylemez H, Duration of Google Scholar
[2]
preoperative scrotal pain may predict the Google Scholar
[3]
success of microsurgical varicocelectomy, Google Scholar
[4]
Int Braz J Urol, 2010; 36(1): 55-59. Google Scholar
[5]
Baazeem A, Jason M, Microsurgical Google Scholar
[6]
varicocelectomy for infertile men with Google Scholar
[7]
oligospermia: differential effect of bilateral Google Scholar
[8]
and unilateral varicocele on pregnancy Google Scholar
[9]
outcomes, BJU International, 2009; 104(4): Google Scholar
[10]
-528. Google Scholar
[11]
Elzanaty S, Johansen C, Effect of Google Scholar
[12]
Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocele Google Scholar
[13]
Repair on Chronic Dull Scrotal Pain in Men Google Scholar
[14]
with Grade II-III Lesions, Curr Urol, 2015; Google Scholar
[15]
(4): 188-191. Google Scholar
[16]
Gupta C, Chinchole V, Microscopic Google Scholar
[17]
varicocelectomy as a treatment option for Google Scholar
[18]
patients with severe oligospermia, Investig Google Scholar
[19]
Clin Urol, 2018; 59(3): 182-186. Google Scholar
[20]
Hou Y, Zhang Y, Comparison between Google Scholar
[21]
Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy Google Scholar
[22]
with and without Testicular Delivery for Google Scholar
[23]
Infertile Men: Is Testicular Delivery an Google Scholar
[24]
Unnecessary Procedure, Urol J, (2009): Google Scholar
[25]
(4): 2261-2266. Google Scholar
[26]
Kim H, Song P, Microsurgical ligation Google Scholar
[27]
for painful varicocele: effectiveness and Google Scholar
[28]
predictors of pain resolution, Yonsei Med J., Google Scholar
[29]
; 53(1): 145-150. Google Scholar
[30]
Long H, Bac HN, Ca KNV et al., Comparision Google Scholar
[31]
of outcomes and complications of42 Google Scholar
[32]
subinguinal microsurgical and laparoscopic Google Scholar
[33]
varicocelectomy, Journal of practical Google Scholar
[34]
medicine, 2011; 769+770: 242-250. Google Scholar
[35]
Nhu TN, Varicocele: Clinical andrology, Ho Google Scholar
[36]
Chi Minh City General Publishing House, Google Scholar
[37]
; p. 154-167. Google Scholar
[38]
Nhu TN, Thuy CT, Dung TBM, Google Scholar
[39]
Bilateral scroto-inguinal microscopic Google Scholar
[40]
varicocelectomy: efficaly in male infertility Google Scholar
[41]
treatment, Journal of Practical Medicine, Google Scholar
[42]
; 14 (2), p. 43-47. Google Scholar
[43]
Park H, Lee S, Predictors of pain resolution Google Scholar
[44]
after varicocelectomy for painful varicocele, Google Scholar
[45]
Asian J Androl, 2011; 13(5): 754-758. Google Scholar
[46]
Quang N, Son NN, The diagnosis Google Scholar
[47]
characteristics and the evaluation of Google Scholar
[48]
microscopic varicocelectomy results at Viet Google Scholar
[49]
Duc Hospital 06/2013 – 05/2014, Ho Chi Google Scholar
[50]
Minh City Journal of Medicine, 2015; 19 (4), Google Scholar
[51]
p. 177 – 181. Google Scholar
[52]
Quang N, Thao HN, Investigating of the Google Scholar
[53]
diagnostic characteristics of varicocele in Google Scholar
[54]
patients operated at Viet Duc University Google Scholar
[55]
Hospital, Journal of Medicine and PharmacyHue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Google Scholar
[56]
; p. 287-290. Google Scholar
[57]
Sun X, Wang J, Bilateral is superior to Google Scholar
[58]
unilateral varicocelectomy in infertile Google Scholar
[59]
males with left clinical and right subclinical Google Scholar
[60]
varicocele: a prospective randomized Google Scholar
[61]
controlled study, Int Urol Nephrol, 2017; Google Scholar
[62]
(2): 205-210. Google Scholar
[63]
Tavalaee M, Abbasi H, Semen parameters Google Scholar
[64]
and chromatin packaging in microsurgical Google Scholar
[65]
varicocelectomy patients, Int J Fertil Steril, Google Scholar
[66]
; 6(3): 165-174. Google Scholar
[67]
Vyas H, Bhandari V, A prospective Google Scholar
[68]
randomized comparative trial between open Google Scholar
[69]
subinguinal and loupe assisted subinguinal Google Scholar
[70]
varicocelectome: A single center experience, Google Scholar
[71]
Urol Ann, 2017; 9(1): 13-17. Google Scholar
[72]
Yuan R, Zhuo H, Efficacy and safety of Google Scholar
[73]
varicocelectomies: A meta-analysis, Syst Google Scholar
[74]
Biol Reprod Med, 2017; 63(2): 120-129. Google Scholar
[75]
Zhang J, Xu Q, Predictors for spontaneous Google Scholar
[76]
pregnancy after microsurgical subinguinal Google Scholar
[77]
varicocelectomy: a prospective cohort study, Google Scholar
[78]
Int Urol Nephrol, 2015; 49(6), pp. 955-960. Google Scholar