Articles Vol. 67 No. CĐ3-NCKH 02/04/2026

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF THE I-GEL SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY IN ANESTHESIA FOR REGIONAL LIPOSUCTION PROCEDURES AT GANGWHOO AESTHETIC HOSPITAL

Ta Duc Luan1,2, Nguyen Tan Phong3,4, Phung Manh Cuong3,4, Lam Tri Duc5,6
1 Faculty of Medicine, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City
2 Khoa Y, Trường Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
3 Gangwhoo Aesthetic Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City.
4 Bệnh viện Thẩm mỹ Gangwhoo, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
5 Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City
6 Khoa kỹ thuật xét nghiệm y học, Trường Đại học Nguyễn Tất Thành, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD3.4732
44 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Background: Regional liposuction procedures have become increasingly common in aesthetic surgery. The selection of an appropriate airway management strategy plays a crucial role in ensuring effective ventilation, hemodynamic stability, and minimizing anesthesia-related complications. The i-gel supraglottic airway is a newer-generation device that has been widely adopted in clinical practice; however, data evaluating its effectiveness and safety in liposuction surgery in Vietnam remain limited.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anesthesia using the i-gel supraglottic airway in regional liposuction procedures at Gangwhoo Aesthetic Hospital.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 72 patients aged 18 years and older who underwent general anesthesia with the i-gel supraglottic airway for regional liposuction at Gangwhoo Aesthetic Hospital between May 2025 and July 2025. Outcome measures included patient characteristics, success rate of i-gel insertion, airway pressures, gas exchange parameters, hemodynamic variables, and airway-related adverse events.

Results: The first-attempt success rate of i-gel insertion was 98.6%, with no cases requiring conversion to endotracheal intubation. The mean peak airway pressure was 14.24 ± 1.87 cmH₂O, and the mean oropharyngeal leak pressure was 26.8 ± 3.9 cmH₂O. Oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂) were maintained within physiological ranges throughout anesthesia. No episodes of regurgitation, aspiration, postoperative sore throat, or hoarseness were recorded.

Conclusions: The i-gel supraglottic airway is an effective and safe airway management device for general anesthesia in regional liposuction procedures and is suitable for routine use in aesthetic surgery settings.

References
[1]
Võ Văn Hiển, Hoàng Thanh Tuấn. Hiệu quả gây mê mask thanh quản trong phẫu thuật nâng ngực bằng túi độn, Tạp chí Y học Thảm họa và Bỏng. 2023;4:55–60. Google Scholar
[2]
Mitobe, Yuta, et al. “A Literature Review of Factors Related to Postoperative Sore Throat.” Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, vol. 14, no. 2, Feb. 2022, pp. 88–94. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4665. Google Scholar
[3]
Pawar, Dr Hemant Shivram, et al. “Study of I- Gel Device in Patients Posted for Short Duration Elective Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Center.” European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 14, July 2024, pp. 409–16. healthcare-bulletin.co.uk, https://doi.org/10.61336/ejcm/24-4-51. Google Scholar
[4]
Ari DE, Ar AY, Karip CS, Siyahkoc I, et al. Comparison of I-gel with Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway regarding the ease of use and clinical performance. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2015;43:299–303. Google Scholar
[5]
5.Pawar, Dr Hemant Shivram, et al. “Study of I- Gel Device in Patients Posted for Short Duration Elective Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Center.” European Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 14, July 2024, pp. 409–16. healthcare-bulletin.co.uk, https://doi.org/10.61336/ejcm/24-4-51. Google Scholar
[6]
Choi SR, Lee TY, Kim SW, et al. Comparison of clinical performance of I-gel® and Baska Mask® during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72:576–582. Google Scholar
[7]
Hashemian SMR, Nouraei N, Razavi SS, et al. Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed patients. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014;4(4):288–292. doi:10.4103/2229-5151.147520 Google Scholar
[8]
Kim MS, Oh JT, Min JY, Lee KH, Lee JR. A randomised comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in infants. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(4):362–367. doi:10.1111/anae.12592 Google Scholar
[9]
Hà Phước Hoàng, Phan Thị Thu Trâm, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Tú, Nguyễn Thị Hà Vy, Hồ Khả Cảnh. Hiệu quả của mặt nạ thanh quản I-gel trong gây mê để cắt túi mật nội soi. Tạp chí Y Dược học Cần Thơ. 2023. Google Scholar
[10]
Đỗ Quang Thụ, Nguyễn Toàn Thắng, Phạm Thanh Hà. So sánh hiệu quả kiểm soát đường thở của mask thanh quản I-gel với mask thanh quản Classic ở trẻ em trong phẫu thuật lác. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024;545(2). Google Scholar