Articles Vol. 67 No. CĐ3-NCKH 02/04/2026

EFFECTIVENESS OF A TELEREHABILITATION PROGRAM FOLLOWING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION OF THE KNEE JOINT

Truong Thi Hai Anh1,2,3,4, Dang Thi Thu Hang1,2,3,4, Ha Chan Nhan1,2,3,4
1 Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University
2 Hospital of Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy
3 Trường Đại học Y Dược, Đại học Huế
4 Bệnh viện Trường Đại học Y Dược Huế
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD3.4720
25 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee joint.

Subjects and methods: A quasi-experimental controlled study with pre- and post-intervention assessments was conducted on 50 patients post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction from November 2024 to July 2025. Participants were divided into 2 groups: conventional rehabilitation (n = 25) and telerehabilitation via the OpenTeleRehab application (n = 25). The numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, knee range of motion (ROM), and the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form were assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks of intervention. ANCOVA was utilized to adjust for baseline differences in knee flexion ROM.

Results: After 4 weeks, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding improvements in NRS, IKDC scores, or knee extension ROM (p > 0.05). Notably, after adjusting for baseline values, the telerehabilitation group showed significantly greater improvement in knee flexion ROM compared to the conventional rehabilitation group (46.60° ± 14.84° vs 24.00° ± 17.14°; p = 0.048).

Conclusion: Telerehabilitation is an effective and feasible approach during the early phase after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, yielding functional and range-of-motion improvements that are comparable to or better than conventional methods.

References
[1]
van Melick N, van Cingel R.E et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med, 2016, 50 (24): 1506-15. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095898. Google Scholar
[2]
Logerstedt D.S, Scalzitti D et al. Knee stability and movement coordination impairments: knee ligament sprain revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2017, 47 (11): A1-A47. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.0303. Google Scholar
[3]
Nguyen S.P, Tran H.T et al. Caregiver perceptions, practices, and challenges in accessing rehabilitation services for people with disabilities in rural Vietnam. Disabilities, 2025, 5 (2): 44. doi: 10.3390/disabilities5020044. Google Scholar
[4]
Cottrell M.A, Galea O.A et al. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil, 2017, 31 (5): 625-38. doi: 10.1177/0269215516645148. Google Scholar
[5]
Lim J.Y, Yu H.J et al. Effectiveness of in-home, augmented reality-based telerehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Orthop J Sports Med, 2024, 12 (10): 23259671241271729. doi: 10.1177/23259671241271729. Google Scholar
[6]
Liao W.J, Lee K.T et al. Postoperative rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction through telerehabilitation with artificial intelligence brace during COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Med, 2023, 12 (14). doi: 10.3390/jcm12144865. Google Scholar