Articles Vol. 67 No. 3 31/03/2026

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DEEP PLANE FACELIFT IN IMPROVING FACIAL AGING IN THE COMMUNITY

Ho Kha Vinh Nhan1,2
1 Da Nang University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Trường Y Dược Đại học Đà Nẵng
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i3.4641
16 Views
4 Downloads
Abstract

ABSTRACT

Objective: To review and evaluate the efficacy and safety of the deep plane facelift technique in the management of facial aging within the community setting.

Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted by collecting, selecting, and analyzing both classical and contemporary studies related to facial aging, facial anatomy, surgical indications, deep plane facelift techniques, and clinical outcomes. Only peer-reviewed sources were included, with emphasis on aesthetic improvement, regional facial rejuvenation, and complication rates.

Results: Deep plane facelift demonstrated significant improvement in the midface, nasolabial folds, jowls, and jawline, providing more natural and longer-lasting results compared with superficial facelift techniques. However, it is associated with a higher complication rate and requires surgeons with advanced anatomical knowledge and technical expertise. Some cases showed recurrent ptosis when patient selection was suboptimal.

Conclusion: Deep plane facelift is an optimal approach for patients with moderate to severe facial aging, offering superior and durable aesthetic outcomes when performed with proper technique and appropriate indications. Nevertheless, safety considerations and careful patient selection remain essential.

References
[1]
. Gonzalez-Ulloa, M., & Flores, E. S. (1965). Senility of the face—basic study to understand its causes and effects. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 36(2), 239-246. Google Scholar
[2]
. Fitzgerald, R., Graivier, M. H., Kane, M., Lorenc, Z. P., Vleggaar, D., Werschler, W. P., & Kenkel, J. M. (2010). Update on facial aging. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 30(1_Supplement), 11S-24S. Google Scholar
[3]
. Beylot, C. (2017). Clinical signs of aging. In Cosmetic Medicine and Surgery (pp. 31-42). CRC Press. Google Scholar
[4]
. Swift, A., Liew, S., Weinkle, S., Garcia, J. K., & Silberberg, M. B. (2021). The facial aging process from the “inside out”. Aesthetic surgery journal, 41(10), 1107-1119. Google Scholar
[5]
. Flament, F., Abric, A., Amar, D., Ye, C., Caron, J., & Negre, C. (2020). Changes in facial signs due to age and their respective weights on the perception of age, on a tired‐look or a healthy glow among differently aged Chinese men. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 42(5), 452-461. Google Scholar
[6]
. Kaya, K. S., & Cakmak, O. (2022). Facelift techniques: an overview. Facial Plastic Surgery, 38(06), 540-545. Google Scholar
[7]
. Awad, Y. Z., Nasr, M. A., & Ahmed El-Sayed, M. N. (2025). Comparison between Superficial and Deep Plane Facelift: Meta-Analysis Study. Zagazig University Medical Journal, 31(3), 1257-1271. Google Scholar
[8]
. Ackerman, B. M., & Savalia, N. B. (2025). Systematic Approach to Deep Plane Facelift. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 1-8. Google Scholar
[9]
. Colombo, G., Dotto, A., & Distefano, A. (2025). Critical Review of a Series of 78 Surgical Facial Rejuvenation Procedures With Deep-plane Technique. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open, 13(6), e6897. Google Scholar
[10]
. Fedok, F. G., & Lighthall, J. G. (2022). Evaluation and treatment planning for the aging face patient. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics, 30(3), 277-290. Google Scholar