Keywords
Genital prolapse, Crossen surgery method.
Abstract
Objectives: Evaluate of the results of Crossen surgery method to treat genital prolapse at Nghe An
Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital.
Subjects-methods: Cross-sectional description of all patients with grade II, grade III genital prolapse
who underwent Crossen surgery method at Nghe An Obstetrics and Pediatrics Hospital.
Result: The mean surgery time was 69.4 ± 15.7 minutes. Average time after surgery 6.1 ± 2.1 days.
The rate of postoperative complications is 10% including fever and urinary retention after surgery.
All patients were discharged in stable health, in which good condition accounted for 80%.
Conclusions: Crossen surgery method is feasible and safe. The method has a short operative time
and low complication rate.
References
[1]
Butrick CW, Pathophysiology of pelvic floor
Google Scholar
[2]
hypertonic disorders. Obstet Gynecol Clin North
Google Scholar
[3]
Am, 36(3): p. 699-705, 2009.
Google Scholar
[4]
ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 214, Pelvic
Google Scholar
[5]
Organ Prolapse, Obstet Gynecol. 134(5): p.
Google Scholar
[6]
e126-e142, 2019.
Google Scholar
[7]
Yuk JS, The prevalence and treatment pattern
Google Scholar
[8]
of clinically diagnosed pelvic organ prolapse:
Google Scholar
[9]
a Korean National Health Insurance Databasebased cross-sectional study 2009–2015. Scientific
Google Scholar
[10]
Reports, 8(1): p. 1334, 2018.
Google Scholar
[11]
Trần Phi Liệt, Tình hình phẫu thuật sa sinh dục
Google Scholar
[12]
trong 6 năm tại Bệnh viện I Nam Hà và các chỉ
Google Scholar
[13]
định phẫu thuật Sản phụ khoa tài liệu nghiên cứu:
Google Scholar
[14]
p. 30-33, 1974.
Google Scholar
[15]
Vương Văn Phú, Nhận xét kết quả phẫu thuật
Google Scholar
[16]
sa sinh dục 5 năm 1966-1970 tại Bệnh viện Hải
Google Scholar
[17]
Hưng. Sản phụ khoa tài liệu nghiên cứu: p. 55-60,
Google Scholar
[18]
Jokhio AH, Rizvi RM, MacArthur C, Prevalence
Google Scholar
[19]
of pelvic organ prolapse in women, associated
Google Scholar
[20]
factors and impact on quality of life in rural
Google Scholar
[21]
Pakistan: population-based study. BMC Women’s
Google Scholar
[22]
Health, 20(1): p. 82, 2020.
Google Scholar
[23]
David GGL, Fidel V, Rogerio L, PERIOPERATIVE
Google Scholar
[24]
MANAGEMENT OF COMPLICATIONS, in
Google Scholar
[25]
Comprehensive Gynecology, 2021.
Google Scholar
[26]
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 195 (2018):
Google Scholar
[27]
Prevention of Infection After Gynecologic
Google Scholar
[28]
Procedures. Obstet Gynecol, 131(6): p.
Google Scholar
[29]
e172-e189.
Google Scholar
[30]
Trương Quang Vinh, Nghiên cứu ứng dụng kỹ
Google Scholar
[31]
thuật cắt tử cung toàn phần đường âm đạo để điều
Google Scholar
[32]
trị một số bệnh lý tử cung không sa, Trường Đại
Google Scholar
[33]
học Y khoa Huế, 2001.
Google Scholar
[34]
Seymour RJ, Management of Perioperative
Google Scholar
[35]
Complications in Gynecology. Can J Surg,
Google Scholar
[36]
(6):476, 1997.
Google Scholar