Articles Vol. 67 No. 2 02/03/2026

IMPACT OF OBESITY, DIABETES, AND SMOKING ON SPINE SURGERY OUTCOMES

Phan Quoc Trung1,2, Phan Thanh Tai3,4
1 Vo Truong Toan University
2 Trường Đại học Võ Trường Toản
3 Vo Truong Toan University Hospital
4 Bệnh viện Đại học Võ Trường Toản
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i2.4357
15 Views
10 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To synthesize contemporary evidence on how obesity, diabetes mellitus, and smoking influence perioperative and longer‑term outcomes after spine surgery, and to highlight practical optimization strategies.

Methods: A narrative review of recent systematic reviews, meta‑analyses, guidelines and large cohort studies published mainly from 2016-2025 was conducted via PubMed and major spine journals. Key outcomes included surgical site infection, pulmonary and renal complications, pseudarthrosis/nonunion, reoperation, length of stay, and patient‑reported outcomes.

Results: Obesity is associated with higher nonunion rates and worse patient‑reported outcomes following lumbar fusion, with increased perioperative events in many - but not all - procedures. Diabetes confers higher risks of surgical site infection and medical complications after fusion and other spine procedures; elevated preoperative HbA1c (7.5-8.0%) correlates with higher infection risk and poorer recovery. Smoking robustly increases pseudarthrosis and adverse outcomes after fusion; preoperative smoking cessation of at least four weeks reduces infectious, wound, and pulmonary complications. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways support risk factor optimization and have demonstrated benefits in spine care.

Conclusions: Obesity, diabetes, and smoking adversely affect spine surgery outcomes, especially fusion biology and infection risk. Prehabilitation bundles incorporating weight management, glycemic optimization (target HbA1c ≤ 7.5% when feasible), and verified smoking cessation ≥ 4 weeks should be prioritized to improve outcomes.

References
[1]
O’Toole J.E, Sasso R.C et al. Adverse Impact of Obesity on Lumbar Spine Fusion, Patient-reported Outcomes and Costs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Spine, 2025, 50 (17): 1208-1218. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005395. Google Scholar
[2]
Adindu E, Singh D et al. The impact of obesity on postoperative and perioperative outcomes in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Spine Journal, 2025, 25 (6): 1081-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.006. Google Scholar
[3]
Ruggiero N, Soliman M.A.R et al. The effect of diabetes on complications after spinal fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery, 2024, 185: e976-e994. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.008. Google Scholar
[4]
Cancienne J.M, Werner B.C et al. Perioperative hemoglobin A1c as a predictor of deep infection following single-level lumbar decompression in patients with diabetes. The spine journal: official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2017, 17 (8), 1100-1105. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.017. Google Scholar
[5]
Gupta R, Chanbour H et al. The ideal threshold of hemoglobin A1C in diabetic patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery. Clinical Spine Surgery, 2023, 36 (6): E226-E233. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001399. Google Scholar
[6]
Arnold P.M, Harrop J.S et al. Adverse impact of smoking on spine fusion and patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine Journal, 2025: 21925682251383167. doi: 10.1177/21925682251383167. Google Scholar
[7]
Jackson K.L, Devine J.G. The effects of smoking and smoking cessation on spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Global Spine Journal, 2016, 6 (7): 695-701. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571285. Google Scholar
[8]
Debono B et al. Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal surgery: ERAS Society recommendations. The Spine Journal, 2021, 21 (5): 729‑752. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.001. Google Scholar
[9]
Yang Li et al. The effect of smoking on the fusion rate of spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery, 2021, 154: 222-235. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.011. Google Scholar