Articles Vol. 67 No. 2 02/03/2026

GESTATIONAL WEIGHT GAIN, PRE-PREGNANCY BMI, AND THE RISK OF DELIVERING AN INFANT ≥ 4,000 g: A NARRATIVE REVIEW

Truong Tran Danh1,2, Tai Phan Thanh3,4, Vuong Nguyen Kim3,4
1 Vo Truong Toan University
2 Trường Đại Học Võ Trường Toản
3 Vo Truong Toan University Hospital
4 Bệnh Viện Đại Học Võ Trường Toản
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i2.4356
59 Views
33 Downloads
Abstract

pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) with the risks of macrosomia (birthweight ≥4,000 g) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA; >90th percentile for gestational age and sex), to evaluate the suitability of Asian BMI cut-offs, and to summarize Vietnam-specific data.

Methods: A narrative review prioritizing systematic reviews/meta-analyses, cohort studies, and clinical guidelines reporting quantitative estimates. GWG was categorized as below/within/above the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations by BMI group.

Results: Pre-pregnancy overweight/obesity is consistently associated with higher risks of macrosomia and LGA; several cohorts report that each 1 kg/m² increase in BMI is linked to an approximately 13–24% higher macrosomia risk. Meta-analyses indicate that GWG above IOM ranges increases the risk of macrosomia (OR≈1.95) and LGA (OR≈1.85) compared with GWG within recommendations; for example, women with normal BMI are advised to gain 11.5–16 kg. Asian BMI thresholds (overweight ≥23.0; obesity ≥27.5 kg/m²) may improve risk stratification in Asian populations. In Vietnam, evidence is largely hospital-based, suggesting a substantial burden of birthweight ≥4,000 g, but heterogeneity in outcome definitions and confounder adjustment highlights the need for standardization and local validation of GWG targets.

Conclusion: Higher pre-pregnancy BMI and excessive GWG are consistent, modifiable risk factors for fetal overgrowth; optimizing preconception weight, providing structured GWG counseling based on IOM guidance (with consideration of Asian BMI cut-offs), and achieving effective glycemic control especially in gestational diabetes may reduce macrosomia/LGA.

 

References
[1]
Wu Y, Xiao H, Chen L, Qin J, Wang T. Pre-pregnancy body mass index and risk of macrosomia: glycemic status-specific thresholds and subgroup interactions in a prospective cohort. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2025;12:1633088. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1633088 Google Scholar
[2]
Zhu Y, Wang L, Qi Q, Cheng Y, Zhu Z, et al. Associations between gestational weight gain under different guidelines and adverse birth outcomes: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in rural western China. PLOS Global Public Health. 2024;4(1):e0002691. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002691 Google Scholar
[3]
Health Canada. Prenatal Nutrition Guidelines for Health Professionals: Gestational Weight Gain. Updated July 25, 2024. Google Scholar
[4]
Jih J, Mukherjea A, Vittinghoff E, et al. Using appropriate body mass index cut points for overweight and obesity among Asian Americans. Preventive Medicine. 2014;65:1–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.010 Google Scholar
[5]
Hồ Thị Thu Hằng, Trần Thái Thanh Tâm. Đặc điểm lâm sàng và kết cục thai kì của trẻ sinh ra từ sản phụ thai to tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Vĩnh Long. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2025;549(3):371–374. DOI: 10.51298/vmj.v549i3.14016 Google Scholar
[6]
Akanmode AM, Mahdy H. Macrosomia. StatPearls [Internet]. 2025. Google Scholar
[7]
Shi P, Liu A, Yin X. Association between gestational weight gain in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021;21(1):508. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03982-4 Google Scholar
[8]
Harvey L, van Elburg R, van der Beek EM. Macrosomia and large for gestational age in Asia: One size does not fit all. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(6):1929–1945. DOI: 10.1111/jog.14787 Google Scholar