Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ1-NCKH 27/01/2026

EVALUATION OF ENDOVASCULAR INTERVENTION RESULTS AORTIC BINOCULAR RECONSTRUCTION WITH OVERLAY STENT IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC AORTIC-PELVIC OCCLUSION

Lam Thao Cuong1,2,3,4, Tran Thanh Vy1,2,3,4
1 Faculty of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh city
2 Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city
3 Khoa Lồng ngực - Mạch máu, Bệnh viện Đại học Y Dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Việt Nam
4 Bộ môn Phẫu thuật Lồng ngực - Tim mạch, Trường Y, Đại học Y Dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD1.4238
15 Views
8 Downloads
Keywords
Chronic aorto-iliac artery stenosis, endovascular intervention, covered stent.
Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the results of endovascular stent grafting for the treatment of chronic aortic-iliac artery stenosis at the University Medical Center of Ho Chi Minh City.

Subjects and methods: Retrospective descriptive case series on 36 patients treated with stent grafting for chronic aortic-iliac artery stenosis. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and imaging features of the lesions were collected. Follow-up included clinical assessment, Doppler ultrasound, and ankle-brachial index. Endovascular intervention using a stent graft was performed to reconstruct the stenotic lesion at the aortic-iliac artery bifurcation. The rate of recanalization and re-intervention of the target lesion during follow-up was evaluated.

Results: Of the 36 patients, 77.8% were diagnosed with intermittent claudication and 22.2% with severe limb ischemia. The majority (83.3%) were TASC II D lesions, with the remainder being B and C lesions (8.3% each). The median follow-up time was 12 months. The technical success rate was 91.7%. The ankle-brachial index improved significantly from 0.55 ± 0.24 preoperatively to 0.84 ± 0.17 postoperatively. The rate of minor complications within 30 days was 16.6%, and there were no major complications. The median hospital stay was 4 days. At 6 months and 1 year follow-up, 91.6% and 94.4% of patients, respectively, showed at least one Rutherford grade improvement clinically. The primary and secondary reperfusion rates were 86.1% and 88.9%, respectively, after 1 year. The rate of patients not requiring re-intervention on the target lesion due to clinical indications was 83.3% after 1 year of follow-up.

Conclusion: Endovascular stenting of the aortic bifurcation is a safe and feasible technique for treating chronic aortic-iliac artery stenosis with good results after 1 year in terms of both reperfusion rate and clinical improvement.

References
[1]
Indes J.E, Mandawat A et al. Endovascular procedures for aorto-iliac occlusive disease are associated with superior short-term clinical and economic outcomes compared with open surgery in the inpatient population. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2010, 52 (5): 1173-1179. e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.100. Google Scholar
[2]
Jebbink E.G, Holewijn S et al. Systematic review of results of kissing stents in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 2017, 42: 328-336. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.01.009. Google Scholar
[3]
Al-Hakim R, Lee E.W et al. Hemodynamic analysis of edge stenosis in peripheral artery stent grafts. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 2017, 98 (10): 729-735. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2017.01.011. Google Scholar
[4]
Taeymans K, Jebbink E.G et al. Three-year outcome of the covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation technique for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2018, 67 (5): 1438-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.015. Google Scholar
[5]
Dikmen N, Ozcinar E et al. The long-term results of covered endovascular aortic bifurcation repair in complex aortoiliac disease: a two-year follow-up. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024, 13 (19): 5684. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195684. Google Scholar
[6]
Grimme F.A.B, Goverde P.C.J.M et al. Editor’s choice-first results of the covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique for aortoiliac occlusive disease. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2015, 50 (5): 638-647. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.06.112. Google Scholar
[7]
De Vries S.O, Hunink M.G. Results of aortic bifurcation grafts for aortoiliac occlusive disease: a meta-analysis. J Vasc Surg, 1997, 26 (4): 558-569. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70053-3. Google Scholar
[8]
Salem M, Hosny M.S, Francia F et al. Management of extensive aorto-iliac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 9319 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2021, 44 (10): 1518-1535. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02785-6. Google Scholar