Articles Tập 67 Số CĐ1-NCKH 27/01/2026

PHYSIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF THE PAIN REFLEX AND NATURAL ANALGESIC INHIBITION: FROM GATE CONTROL TO DESCENDING MODULATION

Nguyen Thanh Lam1,2, Phan Thanh Tai3,4, Nguyen Kim Vuong3,4
1 Vo Truong Toan University
2 Trường Đại học Võ Trường Toản
3 Vo Truong Toan University Hospital
4 Bệnh viện Đại học Võ Trường Toản
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67iCD1.4230
24 Views
17 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To synthesize core physiological mechanisms underlying nociceptive reflexes and the body’s natural pain-inhibitory systems, and to appraise non‑pharmacologic strategies that harness endogenous analgesia.

Method: We narratively reviewed landmark primary studies and authoritative reviews on pain physiology and modulation covering gate control, spinal-brainstem descending systems, diffuse noxious inhibitory controls/conditioned pain modulation, placebo/opioid‑dependent mechanisms, mindfulness‑related analgesia, exercise‑induced hypoalgesia, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Selection prioritized highly cited, peer‑reviewed works with mechanistic clarity and human relevance.

Results: Pain reflexes arise from activation of peripheral nociceptors with segmental spinal integration and rapid protective motor outputs; perception is shaped by ascending-descending interactions. Endogenous inhibition involves segmental gating in the dorsal horn, and supraspinal control via periaqueductal gray-rostral ventromedial medulla and locus coeruleus that project to the dorsal horn through opioidergic, serotonergic, and noradrenergic pathways. DNIC/conditioned pain modulation indexes the integrity of these systems. Psychobiological factors including expectation (placebo), attention/mindfulness, and acute exercise recruit overlapping modulatory circuits. Noninvasive somatosensory input (e.g., TENS) engages large‑fiber gating and descending inhibition.

Conclusion: Natural analgesic inhibition is multi‑layered segmental, brainstem, and cortical and can be amplified with behavioral and sensory interventions. Understanding these mechanisms supports rational, low‑risk, multimodal approaches to pain management and provides physiological endpoints (e.g., conditioned pain modulation) for phenotyping and treatment tailoring.

References
[1]
Raja S.N, Carr D.B, Cohen M et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain, 2020, 161 (9): 1976-1982. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001939 Google Scholar
[2]
Melzack R, Wall P.D. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science, 1965, 150 (3699): 971-979. DOI: 10.1126/science.150.3699.971 Google Scholar
[3]
Basbaum A.I, Fields H.L. Endogenous pain control systems: brainstem spinal pathways and endorphin circuitry. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 1984, 7: 309-338. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.001521 Google Scholar
[4]
Millan M.J. Descending control of pain. Progress in Neurobiology, 2002, 66 (6): 355-474. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00009-6 Google Scholar
[5]
Ossipov M.H, Dussor G.O, Porreca F. Central modulation of pain. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2010, 120 (11): 3779-3787. DOI: 10.1172/JCI43766 Google Scholar
[6]
Le Bars D, Dickenson A.H, Besson J.M. Diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNIC). I. Effects on dorsal horn convergent neurones in the rat. Pain, 1979, 6 (3): 283-304. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(79)90049-6 Google Scholar
[7]
Yarnitsky D. Conditioned pain modulation (the diffuse noxious inhibitory control-like effect): its relevance for acute and chronic pain states. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 2010, 23 (5): 611-615. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833c348b Google Scholar
[8]
Zeidan F, Martucci K.T, Kraft R.A, Gordon N.S, McHaffie J.G, Coghill R.C. Brain mechanisms supporting the modulation of pain by mindfulness meditation. Journal of Neuroscience, 2011, 31 (14): 5540-5548. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5791-10.2011 Google Scholar
[9]
Naugle K.M, Fillingim R.B, Riley J.L. A meta-analytic review of the hypoalgesic effects of exercise. Journal of Pain, 2012, 13 (12): 1139-1150. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.09.006 Google Scholar
[10]
Sluka K.A, Walsh D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. The Journal of Pain, 2003, 4 (3): 109-121. DOI: 10.1054/jpai.2003.434 Google Scholar