Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions
continues to be a challenge, with a lower success rate and a higher risk of procedure-related
complications than intervention on non-chronic total occlusion lesions. Due to a paucity of data on
this phenomena in Vietnam, we undertook this study to learn more about the complications associated
with this complicated technique.
Objectives: Determining the rate and factors associated with procedural complications of CTO-PCI.
Subject – Method of Study: Observational study on eligible patients undergone percutaneous
coronary intervention for CTO lesions at the Ho Chi Minh City University Medical Center, Vietnam,
from April 2017 to June 2019.
Results: There were 194 CTO patients undergone percutaneous coronary intervention that were
enrolled in this study. The mean age was 67.3±11.3, in which male accounted for 73.7%. Comorbidities were hypertension (82.5%), old myocardial infarction (26.3%), previous PCI (26.3%),
diabetes mellitus (29.9%), chronic kidney disease (9.8%). There were 77.4% patients hospitalized
for acute coronary syndrome. Mean SYNTAX I score was 21.7±7.2, mean J-CTO score was 2.4±1.1.
Antegrade intervention strategy accounted for 83.0%, with LAD being the most intervened lesion
(55.7%). The overall success rate of the procedure was 87.1%. In-hospital procedural complications
noted in 16 cases (8.2%), included: coronary artery perforation (2.1%), coronary artery dissection
(1.5%), side-branch loss (1.0%), thrombosis (1.0%), procedure-related myocardial infarction (0.5%),
arrhythmia (1.5%), bleeding (0.5%). Factors related to procedural complications included: old age,
previous PCI.
Conclusion: Our study showed a low rate of CTO-PCI related procedural complications (8.2%).
Factors related to high complication risk were old age and previous PCI
COMPLICATIONS OF CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
100
Views
10
Downloads
Abstract
Keywords
Complications, pertacuneous coronary intervention, chronic total occlusion, antegrade, retrograde.
References
[1]
Noguchi T, Miyazaki MDS, Morii I et al.,
Google Scholar
[2]
“Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
Google Scholar
[3]
of chronic total occlusions. Determinants of
Google Scholar
[4]
primary success and long‐term clinical outcome”.
Google Scholar
[5]
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions,
Google Scholar
[6]
, 49 (3), 258-264.
Google Scholar
[7]
George S, Cockburn J, Clayton TC et al., “Longterm follow-up of elective chronic total coronary
Google Scholar
[8]
occlusion angioplasty: analysis from the UK
Google Scholar
[9]
Central Cardiac Audit Database”. Journal of the
Google Scholar
[10]
American College of Cardiology, 2014, 64 (3),
Google Scholar
[11]
-243.
Google Scholar
[12]
Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Karmpaliotis D et al.,
Google Scholar
[13]
“Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion
Google Scholar
[14]
percutaneous coronary intervention: a report
Google Scholar
[15]
from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data
Google Scholar
[16]
Registry)”. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions,
Google Scholar
[17]
, 8 (2), 245-253.
Google Scholar
[18]
Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Karmpaliotis D et al.,
Google Scholar
[19]
“Development and Validation of a Scoring System
Google Scholar
[20]
for Predicting Periprocedural Complications
Google Scholar
[21]
During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Google Scholar
[22]
of Chronic Total Occlusions: The Prospective
Google Scholar
[23]
Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total
Google Scholar
[24]
Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS CTO)
Google Scholar
[25]
Complications Score”. Journal of the American
Google Scholar
[26]
Heart Association, 2016, 5 (10), e004272.
Google Scholar
[27]
Sapontis J, Salisbury AC, Yeh RW et al., “Early
Google Scholar
[28]
procedural and health status outcomes after
Google Scholar
[29]
chronic total occlusion angioplasty: a report
Google Scholar
[30]
from the OPEN-CTO Registry (Outcomes,
Google Scholar
[31]
Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic
Google Scholar
[32]
Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures)”. JACC:
Google Scholar
[33]
Cardiovascular Interventions, 2017, 10 (15),
Google Scholar
[34]
-1534.
Google Scholar
[35]
Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Toma A et al.,
Google Scholar
[36]
“Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic
Google Scholar
[37]
totalocclusionsinpatientswithlowleftventricular
Google Scholar
[38]
ejection fraction”. JACC: Cardiovascular
Google Scholar
[39]
Interventions, 2017, 10 (21), 2158-2170.
Google Scholar
[40]
Rigger J, Hanratty CG, Walsh SJ, “Common and
Google Scholar
[41]
uncommon CTO complications”. Interventional
Google Scholar
[42]
Cardiology Review, 2018, 13 (3), 121.
Google Scholar
[43]
Riley RF, Sapontis J, Kirtane AJ et al.,
Google Scholar
[44]
“Prevalence, predictors, and health status
Google Scholar
[45]
implications of periprocedural complications
Google Scholar
[46]
during coronary chronic total occlusion
Google Scholar
[47]
angioplasty”. EuroIntervention: journal of
Google Scholar
[48]
EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working
Google Scholar
[49]
Group on Interventional Cardiology of the
Google Scholar
[50]
European Society of Cardiology, 2018, 14 (11),
Google Scholar
[51]
e1199-e1206.
Google Scholar
[52]
Konstantinidis NV, Werner GS, Deftereos S et
Google Scholar
[53]
al., “Temporal trends in chronic Total occlusion
Google Scholar
[54]
interventions in Europe: 17 626 procedures from
Google Scholar
[55]
the European registry of chronic Total occlusion”.
Google Scholar
[56]
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2018,
Google Scholar
[57]
(10), e006229.
Google Scholar
[58]
Lee SW, Lee PH, Ahn JM et al., “Randomized trial
Google Scholar
[59]
evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention
Google Scholar
[60]
for the treatment of chronic total occlusion: the
Google Scholar
[61]
DECISION-CTO trial”. Circulation, 2019, 139
Google Scholar
[62]
(14), 1674-1683.
Google Scholar
[63]
Vescovo GM, Zivelonghi C, Scott B et al.,
Google Scholar
[64]
“Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic
Google Scholar
[65]
Total Occlusion”, 2020.
Google Scholar
[66]
YbarraLF,RinfretS,BrilakisESetal.,“Definitions
Google Scholar
[67]
and Clinical Trial Design Principles for Coronary
Google Scholar
[68]
Artery Chronic Total Occlusion Therapies: CTOARC Consensus Recommendations”. Circulation,
Google Scholar
[69]
, 143 (5), 479-500.
Google Scholar
[70]
Karacsonyi J, Vemmou E, Nikolakopoulos ID
Google Scholar
[71]
et al., “Complications of chronic total occlusion
Google Scholar
[72]
percutaneous coronary intervention”. Neth Heart
Google Scholar
[73]
J, 2021, 29 (1), 60-67.
Google Scholar