Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions
continues to be a challenge, with a lower success rate and a higher risk of procedure-related
complications than intervention on non-chronic total occlusion lesions. Due to a paucity of data on
this phenomena in Vietnam, we undertook this study to learn more about the complications associated
with this complicated technique.
Objectives: Determining the rate and factors associated with procedural complications of CTO-PCI.
Subject – Method of Study: Observational study on eligible patients undergone percutaneous
coronary intervention for CTO lesions at the Ho Chi Minh City University Medical Center, Vietnam,
from April 2017 to June 2019.
Results: There were 194 CTO patients undergone percutaneous coronary intervention that were
enrolled in this study. The mean age was 67.3±11.3, in which male accounted for 73.7%. Comorbidities were hypertension (82.5%), old myocardial infarction (26.3%), previous PCI (26.3%),
diabetes mellitus (29.9%), chronic kidney disease (9.8%). There were 77.4% patients hospitalized
for acute coronary syndrome. Mean SYNTAX I score was 21.7±7.2, mean J-CTO score was 2.4±1.1.
Antegrade intervention strategy accounted for 83.0%, with LAD being the most intervened lesion
(55.7%). The overall success rate of the procedure was 87.1%. In-hospital procedural complications
noted in 16 cases (8.2%), included: coronary artery perforation (2.1%), coronary artery dissection
(1.5%), side-branch loss (1.0%), thrombosis (1.0%), procedure-related myocardial infarction (0.5%),
arrhythmia (1.5%), bleeding (0.5%). Factors related to procedural complications included: old age,
previous PCI.
Conclusion: Our study showed a low rate of CTO-PCI related procedural complications (8.2%).
Factors related to high complication risk were old age and previous PCI
COMPLICATIONS OF CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
18
Views
0
Downloads
Keywords
Complications, pertacuneous coronary intervention, chronic total occlusion, antegrade, retrograde.
Abstract
References
[1]
Noguchi T, Miyazaki MDS, Morii I et al.,
Google Scholar
[2]
“Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty
Google Scholar
[3]
of chronic total occlusions. Determinants of
Google Scholar
[4]
primary success and long‐term clinical outcome”.
Google Scholar
[5]
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions,
Google Scholar
[6]
, 49 (3), 258-264.
Google Scholar
[7]
George S, Cockburn J, Clayton TC et al., “Longterm follow-up of elective chronic total coronary
Google Scholar
[8]
occlusion angioplasty: analysis from the UK
Google Scholar
[9]
Central Cardiac Audit Database”. Journal of the
Google Scholar
[10]
American College of Cardiology, 2014, 64 (3),
Google Scholar
[11]
-243.
Google Scholar
[12]
Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Karmpaliotis D et al.,
Google Scholar
[13]
“Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion
Google Scholar
[14]
percutaneous coronary intervention: a report
Google Scholar
[15]
from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data
Google Scholar
[16]
Registry)”. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions,
Google Scholar
[17]
, 8 (2), 245-253.
Google Scholar
[18]
Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Karmpaliotis D et al.,
Google Scholar
[19]
“Development and Validation of a Scoring System
Google Scholar
[20]
for Predicting Periprocedural Complications
Google Scholar
[21]
During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Google Scholar
[22]
of Chronic Total Occlusions: The Prospective
Google Scholar
[23]
Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total
Google Scholar
[24]
Occlusion Intervention (PROGRESS CTO)
Google Scholar
[25]
Complications Score”. Journal of the American
Google Scholar
[26]
Heart Association, 2016, 5 (10), e004272.
Google Scholar
[27]
Sapontis J, Salisbury AC, Yeh RW et al., “Early
Google Scholar
[28]
procedural and health status outcomes after
Google Scholar
[29]
chronic total occlusion angioplasty: a report
Google Scholar
[30]
from the OPEN-CTO Registry (Outcomes,
Google Scholar
[31]
Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic
Google Scholar
[32]
Total Occlusion Hybrid Procedures)”. JACC:
Google Scholar
[33]
Cardiovascular Interventions, 2017, 10 (15),
Google Scholar
[34]
-1534.
Google Scholar
[35]
Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Toma A et al.,
Google Scholar
[36]
“Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic
Google Scholar
[37]
totalocclusionsinpatientswithlowleftventricular
Google Scholar
[38]
ejection fraction”. JACC: Cardiovascular
Google Scholar
[39]
Interventions, 2017, 10 (21), 2158-2170.
Google Scholar
[40]
Rigger J, Hanratty CG, Walsh SJ, “Common and
Google Scholar
[41]
uncommon CTO complications”. Interventional
Google Scholar
[42]
Cardiology Review, 2018, 13 (3), 121.
Google Scholar
[43]
Riley RF, Sapontis J, Kirtane AJ et al.,
Google Scholar
[44]
“Prevalence, predictors, and health status
Google Scholar
[45]
implications of periprocedural complications
Google Scholar
[46]
during coronary chronic total occlusion
Google Scholar
[47]
angioplasty”. EuroIntervention: journal of
Google Scholar
[48]
EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working
Google Scholar
[49]
Group on Interventional Cardiology of the
Google Scholar
[50]
European Society of Cardiology, 2018, 14 (11),
Google Scholar
[51]
e1199-e1206.
Google Scholar
[52]
Konstantinidis NV, Werner GS, Deftereos S et
Google Scholar
[53]
al., “Temporal trends in chronic Total occlusion
Google Scholar
[54]
interventions in Europe: 17 626 procedures from
Google Scholar
[55]
the European registry of chronic Total occlusion”.
Google Scholar
[56]
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2018,
Google Scholar
[57]
(10), e006229.
Google Scholar
[58]
Lee SW, Lee PH, Ahn JM et al., “Randomized trial
Google Scholar
[59]
evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention
Google Scholar
[60]
for the treatment of chronic total occlusion: the
Google Scholar
[61]
DECISION-CTO trial”. Circulation, 2019, 139
Google Scholar
[62]
(14), 1674-1683.
Google Scholar
[63]
Vescovo GM, Zivelonghi C, Scott B et al.,
Google Scholar
[64]
“Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic
Google Scholar
[65]
Total Occlusion”, 2020.
Google Scholar
[66]
YbarraLF,RinfretS,BrilakisESetal.,“Definitions
Google Scholar
[67]
and Clinical Trial Design Principles for Coronary
Google Scholar
[68]
Artery Chronic Total Occlusion Therapies: CTOARC Consensus Recommendations”. Circulation,
Google Scholar
[69]
, 143 (5), 479-500.
Google Scholar
[70]
Karacsonyi J, Vemmou E, Nikolakopoulos ID
Google Scholar
[71]
et al., “Complications of chronic total occlusion
Google Scholar
[72]
percutaneous coronary intervention”. Neth Heart
Google Scholar
[73]
J, 2021, 29 (1), 60-67.
Google Scholar