Articles Vol. 66 No. CĐ16-HNKH Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 2 02/10/2025

3. CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND RESULTS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF POSTERIOR URETHRAL VALVE IN CHILDREN

Pham Ngoc Thach1, Nguyen Cao Hoang Nam1, Tran Nguyen Nhat Thang2, Le Nguyen Yen1,2, Truong Nguyen Uy Linh2
1 Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 2
2 Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
Corresponding author: dr.thachpham@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66iCD16.3315
15 Views
17 Downloads
Abstract

Objectives: Analysis of clinical and paraclinical characteristics and evaluation of the results of endoscopic posterior urethral valve resection surgery in children.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 27 cases of endoscopic posterior urethral valve resection performed at Children’s Hospital 2 between January 2015 and December 2023.

Results: There were 27 cases included in the study with a median age of 4 months. Chief presenting symptoms was abnormal urination (dysuria, dribbling), observed in 44.4% of cases. The decision for primary surgery was influenced by various factors, including renal function, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), hydronephrosis, megaureter, and the urethroscopic size relative to the patient. Primary surgery included endoscopic posterior urethral valve resection (40.7%), vesicostomy (40.7%), and endoscopic posterior urethral valve resection combined with vesicostomy (18.6%). The rate of postoperative complications was 29.6%, including residual valves and urethral stricture. Favorable outcomes were achieved in 59.3% of cases, moderate results occurred in 22.2%, and unfavorable outcomes were observed in 18.5% of instances.

Conclusion: Endoscopic posterior urethral valve resection surgery is a minimally invasive technique with a high success rate and minimal complication rate in treatment of posterior urethral valve.

References
[1]
Parkhouse HF, Barratt TM, Dillon MJ (1988). Long-term outcome of boys with posterior urethral valves. British journal of urology;62(1):59-62. Google Scholar
[2]
Puri P, Paolo C, Michele I (2018). Posterior urethral valves. 4th.CRC Press. Google Scholar
[3]
Hofmann AA-O, Haider M, Cox A, Vauth F, Rösch WH (2022). Is Vesicostomy Still a Contemporary Method of Managing Posterior Urethral Valves?. Children Journal.;2227-2267 Google Scholar
[4]
Nasir AA, Oyinloye AO, Abdur-Rahman LO (2020). Short-Term Outcomes of Treatment of Boys with Posterior Urethral Valves. Nigerian medical journal:journal of the Nigeria Medical Association.;306-311. Google Scholar
[5]
Lê CT, Lê TH, Lê TS, Vries CD (2005). Cắt nội soi trong điều trị van niệu đạo sau. Tạp chí Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.;9:34 - 39. Google Scholar
[6]
Phạm NT, Lê NY, Trần QV, Lê TĐ (2013). Kết quả điều trị cắt van niệu đạo sau qua nội soi tại Bệnh viện Nhi đồng 2. Tạp chí Y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.;17:380-383. Google Scholar
[7]
Sarhan O, El-Ghoneimi A, Hafez A, Dawaba M, Ghali A, Ibrahiem el H (2010). Surgical complications of posterior urethral valve ablation: 20 years experience. Journal of pediatric surgery.;45(11):2222-2226. Google Scholar
[8]
Tourchi A, Kajbafzadeh AM, Aryan Z, Ebadi M (2014). The management of vesicoureteral reflux in the setting of posterior urethral valve with emphasis on bladder function and renal outcome: a single center cohort study. Urology.;83(1):199-205. Google Scholar