Keywords
Rapid sequence intubation, video laryngoscopy, direct laryngoscopy, emergency surgical.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the outcomes of rapid sequence intubation using video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in anesthesia for emergency surgery.
Results: The video laryngoscopy group has a significantly higher proportion of patients with Cormack-Lehane grade I-II compared to that of direct laryngoscopy group (98% vs. 78%, p < 0.05). The glottic exposure time was shorter in the video laryngoscopy group (9.3 ± 2.1 seconds vs. 12.9 ± 3.8 seconds, p < 0.05), and the mean number of intubation attempts was lower (1.02 vs. 1.18, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Rapid sequence intubation using video laryngoscopy offers several advantages over direct laryngoscopy, including reduced procedure time, a higher first-attempt success rate.
References
[1]
Caroline Lak. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, volume 25, issue 8, August 2024, p. 526-532.
Google Scholar
[2]
Lukasz Szarpak, Agnieszka Madziala, Michael Czekajlo et al. Comparison of the UEScope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, cross-over, multi-center manikin study. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018 Sep, 97 (36): e12085. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012085.
Google Scholar
[3]
Alamrakbi W.A et al. Adding a conduit to Glidescope blade facilitates tracheal intubation. Prospective randomized study. Saudi Med J, 2012 Jun, 33 (6): 617-21.
Google Scholar
[4]
Karczewska K, Bialka S, Smereka J, Cyran M, Nowak-Starz G et al. Efficacy and Safety of Video-Laryngoscopy versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Double-Lumen Endotracheal Intubation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med, 2021, 10 (23): 5524.
Google Scholar
[5]
Dương Anh Khoa. Nghiên cứu hiệu quả đặt nội khí quản có video hỗ trợ cho bệnh nhân phẫu thuật cột sống cổ. Luận án tiến sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội, 2022, tr. 67-68.
Google Scholar
[6]
Kriege M, Lang P et al. A comparison of the McGrath videolaryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in the operating theatre: a multicentre randomised controlledtrial. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine, 2024, 79: 801-809.
Google Scholar
[7]
Donald E.G, Griesdale D.L, James McKinney, Peter T Choi. Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth, 2012 Jan, 59 (1): 41-52.
Google Scholar
[8]
Russotto V, Lascarrou J.B, Tassistro E, Parotto M, Antolini L, Bauer P et al. Efficacy and adverse events profile of videolaryngoscopy in critically ill patients: subanalysis of the INTUBE study. Br J Anaesth, 2023, 131 (3): 607-16.
Google Scholar
[9]
Kim S.W, Kim J.H, Kim Y.M, Park J.T, Choi S.P. Comparison of three types of intubation stylets for tracheal intubation with a McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope by novice intubators in simulated cervical immobilisation: A randomised crossover manikin study. Hong Kong J Emerg Med, 2018, 25 (1): 27-32.
Google Scholar