Articles Vol. 66 No. CĐ13- HNKH Gây mê Hồi sức 25/09/2025

28. EVALUATION OF GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN SECTION IN PREGNANT WOMEN WITH PLACENTA ACCRETA

Le Van Dung1,2, Nguyen Trung Hau1,2, Nguyen Ich Hai Nam1,2
1 Hue Central Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Trung ương Huế
Corresponding author: dunglevan247@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66iCD13.3195
16 Views
19 Downloads
Keywords
Placenta accreta, cesarean section, blood loss in surgery.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate hemodynamic status during general anesthesia in caesarean section with placenta accreta and blood loss in surgery. 

Subjects and methods: A retrospective analysis of 42 cases of caesarean section with placenta accreta admitted from May 2015 to May 2025 at Hue Central Hospital.  

Results: Among the studied patients, all had placenta previa and history of caesarean section was 100%. Ultrasonography accurately predicted placenta accreta in 92,86% of cases. All women underwent surgery under general anesthesia. Estimated blood loss ranged from 700 to 3500 ml, with an average of 1350 ml. The average red blood cell transfusion volume was 1050 ml (range 500-3050 ml), the average plasma transfusion volume was 3.2 units. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure dropped significantly 16 minutes after caesarean section when massive blood loss occurred. Bleeding disorder occurred 28.57%, of which 2 cases (4.78%) had disseminated intravascular complications. The rates of bladder and rectal invasion were 26.19% and 2.38%, respectively. Maternal and neonatal mortality was 0%.

Conclusion: Anesthesia for the caesarean section with placenta accreta during the past ten years was quite safe for maternal and neonate, at Hue Central Hospital.

References
[1]
Lê Thị Thu Hà, Nguyễn Thị Bích Ty và cộng sự. Kết cục thai kỳ nhau cài răng lược tại Bệnh viện Từ Dũ. Hội Chu sinh và Sơ sinh, thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 2016. Google Scholar
[2]
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee opinion. Number 266, January 2002: placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 99: 169-70. Google Scholar
[3]
Glaze S, Ekwalanga P, Roberts G et al. Peripartum hysterectomy: 1999 to 2006. NCBI resources, Obstet Gynecol, 2008 Jun, 111 (6): 1449-51. Google Scholar
[4]
Gielchinsky Y, Rojansky N, Fasouliotis S.J, Ezra Y. Placenta accreta- summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases. Placenta. PubMed-NCBI, 2002, 23: 210-4. Google Scholar
[5]
Placenta praevia and placenta praevia accreta: diagnosis and management. RCOG Guideline No. 27, 2005. Google Scholar
[6]
Snegovskikh D, Clebone A, Norwitz E. Anesthetic management of patients with placenta accreta and resusciation strategies for associated massive hemorrhrage. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology, 2011, 24: 274-281. Google Scholar
[7]
Samina Ismail. Placenta accreta: anesthetic management and resuscitation strategies. Anaesth Pain & Intensive Care, 2014, 18 (4): 371-76. Google Scholar
[8]
Warshak C.R, Eskander R, Hull A.D et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of plcenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108: 573-81. Google Scholar
[9]
Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard J.U. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 192: 1458-61. Google Scholar
[10]
Zhang C, Liu X.Y, Fan G.S, Yang J.Q, Liu J.T, Bian X.M. Clinical analysis of 47 cases of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters, 19080513, PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE. Google Scholar
[11]
Zelop C.M, Harlow B.L, Frigoletto F.D et al. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1993, 168: 1443-8. Google Scholar