Articles Vol. 66 No. CĐ13- HNKH Gây mê Hồi sức 25/09/2025

15. QUALITY OF POSTOPERATIVE RECOVERY FROM THE PATIENT'S PERSPECTIVE AT VINMEC NHA TRANG INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL IN 2024-2025

Le Tan Luc1,2, Le Tra Thanh Nguyen1,2, Luu Chi Hieu1,2
1 Vinmec Nha Trang International General Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Đa khoa Quốc tế Vinmec Nha Trang
Corresponding author: v.luclt3@vinmec.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66iCD13.3181
43 Views
71 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To assess the quality of recovery and satisfaction with postoperative pain control and anesthesia, and to describe some factors influencing hospital recovery.

Subjects and methods: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study involving postoperative patients aged 18 years or older, who were hospitalized for at least 24 hours at Vinmec Nha Trang International Hospital between May 2024 and May 2025. A total of 897 patients were surveyed using the QoR-15 scale (Vietnamese version, translated and validated).

Results: The mean QoR-15 score was 141.2 ± 10.79, indicating a good level of recovery. A total of 92.3% of patients reported recovery levels ranging from “good” to “excellent.” Satisfaction with postoperative pain control was high, with 94.1% of patients rating it 9–10. Type of anesthesia (p < 0.05) and length of stay in the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (p < 0.05) significantly affected recovery scores and patient satisfaction. Local anesthesia and PACU stay under 60 minutes were associated with better recovery outcomes.

Conclusions: The QoR-15 scale demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.891) and practical applicability in evaluating postoperative recovery. Optimizing anesthetic techniques and minimizing PACU stay duration may improve care quality and patient satisfaction. Further research is recommended across multiple healthcare settings and diverse patient populations to validate these findings.

References
[1]
Aslanlar E, Aslanlar D.A, Doğanay C, Önal Ö, Sargin M et al. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. Medicine, April 19, 2024, 103 (16): p e37867. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037867. Google Scholar
[2]
Cummings K.C, Xu F, Cummings L.C. Predictors of postoperative recovery and quality of life in patients undergoing major surgery. Anesth Analg, 2015, 120 (1): 135-142. Google Scholar
[3]
Green C.R, Hart-Johnson T. Age-related differences in postoperative recovery: immune system resilience and comorbidity burden in surgical patients aged 30-60. Surg Clin North Am, 2017, 97 (5): 937-950. Google Scholar
[4]
Bakkum-Gamez J.N, Laughlin-Tommaso S.K, Long M.E. Surgical outcomes and complications in elderly patients: the impact of age-related comorbidities. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2019, 67 (3): 489-496. Google Scholar
[5]
White S.M, Moppett I.K. Outcomes after surgery in older patients. Anaesthesia, 2020, 75 (Suppl 1): e132-e140. Google Scholar
[6]
Myles P.S, Myles D.B, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A et al. Minimal clinically important difference for three quality of recovery scales. Anesthesiology, 2016, 125 (1): 39-45. Google Scholar
[7]
Bowyer A, Royse C. Patient-reported outcome measures in perioperative medicine: quality of recovery and perioperative wellbeing. Anaesthesia, 2022, 77 (Suppl 1): 48-56. Google Scholar
[8]
Cummings K.C, Xu F, Cummings L.C. A comparison of outcomes following general surgery procedures: the impact of surgical complexity on postoperative recovery. Ann Surg, 2019, 269 (1): 55-63. Google Scholar
[9]
Ho Y.C, Chen T.H, Su C.H. Postpartum depression and its impact on recovery following cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2020, 41 (1): 12-19. Google Scholar
[10]
Apfelbaum J.L, Chen C, Mehta S.S, Gan T.J. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg, 2012, 115 (2): 405-410. Google Scholar