Articles Vol. 63 No. 2 (2022) 06/04/2022

EXPLOITING THE POTENTIAL OF CASHEW NUT SHELL WASTE TO CREATE ANACARDIC ACID-LIPOSOMAL COMPLEX (AL) WITH INHIBITORY POTENCY AGAINST LUNG CANCER CELLS, CONTRIBUTING TO COMMUNITY HEALTH PROTECTION

Vien Le Tri1,2, Thao Do Thi3,4, Loc Tran Van3,4, Kha Tran Hoang Bao5,6, Hoang Nguyen Hong5,6, Hue Pham Thi5,6, Hue Phung Thi Kim3,4
1 Institute of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
2 Viện khoa học Dược phẩm sinh học, Đại học Quốc gia Yang Ming Chiao Tung
3 Institute of Health Research and Educational Development in Central Highlands
4 Viện Nghiên cứu Sức khoẻ và Phát triển Giáo dục Tây Nguyên
5 Huynh Man Dat High School For The Gifted, Kien Giang
6 Trường THPT chuyên Huỳnh Mẫn Đạt, Kiên Giang
Corresponding author: whitelily109@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v63i2.312
50 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

The cashew tree contains anacardic acid (AA), a natural active ingredient that accounts for about 65% of the shell liquid. This liquid mixture comprises four compounds differing in the saturation degree of the hydrophobic chains, resulting in their limited cellular absorption. Hence, AA shows robust inhibitory activities against the proliferation of many cancer cell lines yet renders low bioavailability and multiple side effects. This study aims to create an AA-encapsulating liposomal material with predictive suppression on cancer cells. AL was fabricated by incorporating AA into liposomes giving particles with nano-size of 99.08-171.2 nm, PDI of 0.228, and zeta potential of -9.38 mV. The results demonstrated that AA hydrogenated from crude AA extract obtained 100% purity. The crystallized AA form weakly inhibited SK-LU-1 with IC50 (inhibition at 50%) = 496.39 ± 9.87 µM, while AA - DMSO showed better effect upon SK-LU-1 with IC50 = 189.39 ± 5.97 µM. AL inhibited SK-LU-1 cells in vitro with an IC50 = 96.59 ± 3.19 µM with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) compared with AA – DMSO. However, AL also suppressed healthy cells with IC50 = 109.79 ± 13.19 µM. Thereby, this combination is expected to increase the potency of AA against cancer cells (SK-LU-1) and reduce the toxic effect on healthy cells. However, it is necessary to combine compounds targeting AL to restrain its influence to create an effective cancer treatment support product, thereby exploiting the precious active ingredients in the source of cashew nut shells thoroughly to server for human health.

References
[1]
. Balasubramanyam K, Swaminathan V, Ranganathan A, et al., Small Molecule Modulators of Histone Acetyltransferase p300. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(21), 19134–19140. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m301580200, 2003 Google Scholar
[2]
. Haeri A, Alinaghian B, Daeihamed M, et al., Preparation and characterization of stable nanoliposomal formulation of fluoxetine as a potential adjuvant therapy for drug-resistant tumors, Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research: IJPR, 13(Suppl), 2014, 3-14. Google Scholar
[3]
. Putri DCA, Dwiastuti R, Marchaban M, et al., Optimization of Mixing Temperature and Sonication Duration in Liposome Preparation. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Community, 14(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.24071/jpsc.142728, 2017. Google Scholar
[4]
. Seong YA, Shin PG, Kim GD, Anacardic acid induces mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in the A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cells. International Journal of Oncology, 2013, 42(3), 1045–1051. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.1763 Google Scholar
[5]
. Zhang Y, Huo M, Zhou J, et al., PKSolver: An add-in program for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis in Microsoft Excel. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2010, 99(3), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.01.007 Google Scholar
[6]
. IARC-WHO, Latest global cancer data: Cancer burden rises to 19.3 million new cases and 10.0 million cancer deaths in 2020. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2020. Google Scholar
[7]
. El-Bassiony T, Saad N, El-Zamkan M, Study on the antimicrobial activity of Ethanol Extract of Propolisagainst enterotoxigenic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in lab prepared Ice-cream. Veterinary World, 2012, 5(3), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2012.155-159. Google Scholar
[8]
. Hamad F, Mubofu E, Potential Biological Applications of Bio-Based Anacardic Acids and Their Derivatives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2015, 16(12), 8569–8590. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16048569 Google Scholar
[9]
. Schneider BUC, Meza A, Beatriz A, et al., Cardanol: toxicogenetic assessment and its effects when combined with cyclophosphamide. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2016, 39(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2015-0170 Google Scholar
[10]
. Lee WH, Loo CY, Traini D, et al., Nano- and micro-based inhaled drug delivery systems for targeting alveolar macrophages. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 2015, 12(6), 1009–1026. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425247.2015.1039509 Google Scholar
[11]
. Filipczak N, Jaromin A, Piwoni A, et al., A Triple Co-Delivery Liposomal Carrier That Enhances Apoptosis via an Intrinsic Pathway in Melanoma Cells. Cancers, 2019, 11(12), 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121982 Google Scholar
[12]
. Sung B, Pandey MK, Ahn KS, et al., Anacardic acid (6-nonadecyl salicylic acid), an inhibitor of histone acetyltransferase, suppresses expression of nuclear factor-κB–regulated gene products involved in cell survival, proliferation, invasion, and inflammation through inhibition of the inhibitory subunit of nuclear factor-κBα kinase, leading to potentiation of apoptosis. Blood, 2008, 111(10), 4880–4891. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-10-117994 Google Scholar
[13]
. Hue PTK, Vien LT, Sy LD, et al., Optimising extraction process from Cashew nut shell, determination of main chemical components and effectiveness in killing harmful insects The Journal of Agriculture and Development, 2021(5): 153-160, ISSN 1859-4581 Google Scholar
[14]
. Araújo JTCD, Lima LA, Vale EP, et al., Toxicological and genotoxic evaluation of anacardic acid loaded-zein nanoparticles in mice, Toxicology Reports, 2020, 7, 1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.08.024 Google Scholar