A cross-sectional study on medical students graduating from Hanoi Medical University. Research results show the average score of the total research skills is 3,10 ± 0,56 on a scale of 5. The average score of the skill "Data analysis and use analysis tools" is the lowest (2,94 ±0,65). In particular, the average score of this skill in the graduation group in 2020 (2,99 ± 0,60) is higher than that of the group graduating in 2008-2019 (2,90 ± 0,69). The need to increase practice training in the graduation group in 2008-2019 (38%) is higher than that of the group graduating in 2020 (17,39%). The percentage of the demand for "encourage students to conduct and publish scientific articles" in the graduation group in 2008-2019 (31,32%) is lower than that of the group graduating in 2020 (38,26%). The above differences are statistically significant with p<0,05. The most chosen training method and evaluation form are "more guidance and cooperation from lecturers" (60,93%) and "practice a research topic in groups" (76,01%) respectively. Gender, year of graduation, science products, and the levels of supervisor’s participation are some factors related to the average score of research skills.
CURRENT STATUS AND TRAINING NEEDS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF STUDENTS GRADUATING FROM HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY AND SOME RELATED FACTORS IN 2020-2021
17
Views
0
Downloads
Keywords
Skills, scientific research, medical students, graduates, training needs.
Abstract
References
[1]
Quan M, Son G, Promoting scientific research in universities, https://nhandan.com.vn/tin-tuc-giao-duc/thuc-day-nghien-cuu-khoa-hoc-trong-cac-truong-dai-hoc-302808/, Accessed October 27, 2020.
Google Scholar
[2]
Zee M, de Boer M, Jaarsma ADC, Acquiring evidence-based medicine and research skills in the undergraduate medical curriculum: three different didactical formats compared. Perspect Med Educ, 2014, 3(5), 357–370.
Google Scholar
[3]
Ratte A, Drees S, Schmidt-Ott T, The importance of scientific competencies in German medical curricula - the student perspective, BMC Med Educ, 2018, 18.
Google Scholar
[4]
Griffin MF, Hindocha S, Publication practices of medical students at British medical schools: Experience, attitudes and barriers to publish, Med Teach, 2011, 33(1), e1–e8.
Google Scholar
[5]
Pallamparthy S, Basavareddy A, Knowledge, attitude, practice, and barriers toward research among medical students: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. Perspect Clin Res, 2019, 10(2), 73–78.
Google Scholar
[6]
Abu-Zaid A, Alkattan K, Integration of scientific research training into undergraduate medical education: a reminder call, Med Educ Online, 2013, 18.
Google Scholar
[7]
Freeman JV, Collier S, Staniforth D, et al., Innovations in curriculum design: A multi-disciplinary approach to teaching statistics to undergraduate medical students. BMC Med Educ, 2008, 8(1), 28.
Google Scholar
[8]
Luo L, Cheng X, Wang S, et al., Blended learning with Moodle in medical statistics: an assessment of knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to e-learning. BMC Med Educ, 2017, 17(1), 170.
Google Scholar
[9]
AlSabah S, Haddad EA, AlSaleh F, The Roles of Students and Supervisors in Medical Research Projects: Expectations and Evaluations, J Med Educ, 2018, 17(4).
Google Scholar
[10]
Fielding S, Poobalan A, Prescott G, et al., Views of medical students: what, when and how do they want statistics taught?. Scott Med J, 2015, 60.
Google Scholar