Articles Vol. 66 No. CĐ11-NCKH 22/08/2025

17. PREGNANCY OUTCOMES OF INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION AT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY FROM 2020 TO 2023

Le Trung Hieu1,2,3,4, Le Chi Bang1,3, Nguyen Thi Bich Van1,2,3,4
1 Hanoi Medical University
2 National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
3 Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội
4 Bệnh viện Phụ Sản Trung ương
Corresponding author: letrunghieu0898@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66iCD11.2811
18 Views
17 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and associated factors among fetuses diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from 2020 to 2023.

Objects and methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study conducted on 111 pregnant women diagnosed with intrauterine growth restriction who delivered at National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023. Data were collected from medical records. Neonatal mortality - related factors were evaluated using logistic regression analysis.

Results: The neonatal mortality rate was 12.6%. Two factors were statistically associated with mortality: gestational age < 32 weeks (OR = 10.1; 95% CI: 1.2-84.6), birth weight < 1000g (OR = 23.7; 95% CI: 5.8-96.4). The most common neonatal complication was respiratory distress syndrome (60.4%), followed by neonatal infections and jaundice. Additionally, 14.4% of neonates presented with multiple concurrent complications.

Conclusion: Intrauterine growth restriction is associated with high rates of neonatal mortality and complications, particularly among preterm infants with low birth weight. Early detection, close monitoring, and timely intervention are essential to improving neonatal outcomes.

References
[1]
Phan Trường Duyệt, Đinh Thế Mỹ. Biểu đồ phát triển cân nặng thai tương ứng với tuổi thai. Lâm sàng sản phụ khoa. Nhà xuất bản Y học, Hà Nội, 2007, tr. 13-4. Google Scholar
[2]
Bộ Y tế. Hướng dẫn chuẩn quốc gia về các dịch vụ chăm sóc sức khỏe sinh sản. Nhà xuất bản Y học, Hà Nội, 2007. Google Scholar
[3]
Bộ môn Phụ Sản, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. Thủ thuật sản phụ khoa. Nhà xuất bản Y học, Hà Nội, 1997, tr. 28-9. Google Scholar
[4]
Yang L, Feng L, Huang L, Li X, Qiu W, Yang K et al. Maternal factors for intrauterine growth retardation: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Reproductive Sciences, 2023, 30 (6): 1737-45. Google Scholar
[5]
Sharma P, Mehta A.U. Study of fetomaternal implications in intrauterine growth restriction pregnancies. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024, 13 (4): 895-9. Google Scholar
[6]
Ullah I.K, Thakur M.K, Varma D. Doppler sonographic evaluation of intrauterine growth restriction of fetus and its correlation with perinatal outcomes among the population of riverine (char) areas of Barpeta Assam. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2023, 12 (4): 965. Google Scholar
[7]
Sharma D, Shastri S, Sharma P. Intrauterine growth restriction: antenatal and postnatal aspects. Clinical medicine insights: pediatrics, 2016, 10: CMPed. S40070. Google Scholar
[8]
Mamopoulos A, Petousis S, Tsimpanakos J, Masouridou S, Kountourelli K, Margioula-Siarkou C et al. Birth weight independently affects morbidity and mortality of extremely preterm neonates. Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, 2015, 7 (7): 511. Google Scholar
[9]
D’Agostin M, Morgia C.D.S, Vento G, Nobile S. Long-term implications of fetal growth restriction. World journal of clinical cases, 2023, 11 (13): 285. Google Scholar