Articles Vol. 66 No. VoL 66. English Version No 1, 2025 15/08/2025

29. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF UNILATERAL MANDIBULAR CONDYLAR FRACTURES

Nguyen Hung Thang1, Dinh Thi Hong Hanh2, Huynh Van Duong3
1 Military Hospital 103
2 Military Hospital 175
3 The Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Corresponding author: honghanh200187@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66ienglish.2774
30 Views
18 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical and radiographic characteristics of patients with unilateral mandibular condylar fractures.

Subjects and Methods: This prospective descriptive study included 40 patients aged 16 years and older with unilateral mandibular condylar fractures who underwent open reduction and internal fixation. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling from July 2024 to April 2025 at the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh City, and Military Hospital 175.

Results:

Among the 40 patients with unilateral mandibular condylar fractures, males accounted for 75%, with traffic accidents as the leading cause (92.5%). Clinically, preauricular tenderness was present in 85% of cases, limited mouth opening in 80%, and malocclusion in 70%. Radiographically, fractures on the posterior condylar process (52.5%) and subcondylar region (55%) were most common. Isolated condylar fractures represented 15% of cases, while the majority (85%) had associated mandibular fractures, most frequently involving the symphysis (52.5%). According to displacement classification, 52.5% of fractures were classified as type II, and 35% were classified as type III.

Conclusion:

The study highlights the predominance of traffic-related trauma and the high incidence of type II and III displacements in unilateral mandibular condylar fractures. These findings enhance current understanding of injury distribution patterns and provide a basis for selecting appropriate treatment approaches tailored to fracture characteristics.

References
[1]
Akhlaghi F, Mafi N, Bastami F. Prevalence of Maxillofacial Fractures and Related Factors: A Five-Year Retrospective Study. Trauma Mon [Internet]. 2019 Mar 12 ;24(4). Google Scholar
[2]
Hussein ZAH. Epidemiological Study of Mandibular Fractures: Aetiology and Site Using Computed Tomography in Al Kut City. Journal of Wasit for Science and Medicine. 2016;9(3):68–74. Google Scholar
[3]
Chen R, Liao L, Huo S, Wu J, Li W. Characteristics of pediatric mandibular condylar fractures in Southwest China: A single-center and 12-year retrospective study. Dental Traumatology. 2024;40(4):444–52. Google Scholar
[4]
Nys M, Van Cleemput T, Dormaar JT, Politis C. Long-Term Complications of Isolated and Combined Condylar Fractures: A Retrospective Study. Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction. 2022 Sep;15(3):246–52. Google Scholar
[5]
Demirdöver C, Geyik A. Open surgical approach to fractures of the mandibular condyle: surgical technique and associated complications. Turk J Med Sci. 2024;54(5):1082–91. Google Scholar
[6]
Nguyen QD, Nguyen PT. Evaluation of the treatment of mandibular condyle fractures through 95 cases. VMJ. 2022 Jul 6;515(1). Google Scholar
[7]
Kozakiewicz M, Walczyk A. Current Frequency of Mandibular Condylar Process Fractures. J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 9;12(4):1394. Google Scholar
[8]
Nguyễn Hùng Thắng, Nguyễn Anh Tú. Nhận xét đặc điểm lâm sàng gãy lồi cầu xương hàm dưới tại Bệnh viện Quân Y 103. Tạp chí Y Dược Học Quân Sự. 2019;6:73–6. Google Scholar
[9]
Maurer M, Klaes T, Meier JK, Gottsauner JM, Taxis J, Schuderer J, et al. Treatment of extracapsular fractures of the mandibular condylar process: A retrospective evaluation of 377 cases. Dent Traumatol. 2023 Dec;39(6):586–96. Google Scholar