Keywords
5S, quality, Binh Thanh Hospital
Abstract
The cross-sectional descriptive study aims to describe the 5S score and analyze some limitations. The study was conducted in June 2020 at Outpatient department, Binh Thanh Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City. The research results show that the average score in Sort is the lowest with 2.2 points, the highest in the Sustain is 4.2 points, and Shine 4.1 points. Through the research, some basic limitations have been noted in implementing 5S implementation at Outpatient department, Binh Thanh Hospital. Therefore, in order to improve 5S, the hospital needs to trainging 5S, have more accurate, scientific and large-scale assessment studies.
References
[1]
Gapp R, Fisher R, and Kobayashi K, Implementing 5S within a Japanese context: an integrated management system; Manage Decis, 2008. 46: p. 565-579.
Google Scholar
[2]
Hirano H, 5S for operators: 5 pillars of the visual workplace. Portland, OR: Productivity Press, 1996.
Google Scholar
[3]
Hirano H, JIT implementation manual—the complete guide to just-in-time manufacturing. Volume 2—waste and the 5S’s. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.
Google Scholar
[4]
Hadfield D, Lean healthcare—implementing 5S in lean or Six Sigma projects. Chelsea: MCS Media, Inc, 2006.
Google Scholar
[5]
Masaaki I, Gemba Kaizen: a commonsense approach to a continuous improvement strategy New York:McGraw Hill, 2012.
Google Scholar
[6]
Taylor & Francis Group, 5S for Healthcare 2010, New York
Google Scholar
[7]
Ikuma LH and Nahmens I, Making safety an integral part of 5S in healthcare. Work, 2014: p. 243-251.
Google Scholar
[8]
Withanachchi N, Karandagoda W, Handa Y, A performance improvement programme at a public hospital in Sri Lanka: an introduction. J Health Organ Manag, 2004: p. 361-369.
Google Scholar
[9]
Kanamori S, Implementation of 5S management method for lean healthcare at a health center in Senegal: a qualitative study of staff perception. Glob Health Action, 2015. 8: p. 27256.
Google Scholar