Articles Vol. 66 No. CĐ7-HNKH Bệnh viện K 22/05/2025

44. CHARACTERISTICS OF FUNCTIONAL SUBSCALES THE QUALITY OF FEMALE GENIO CANCER PATIENTS AT K HOSPITAL IN 2020-2021

Nguyen Xuan Thanh1,2, Nguyen Thi Thuy Van1,2, Nguyen Thi Lua3,4, Nguyen Van Khai5,6, Pham Minh Khue5,6, Nguyen Duc Khoa1,2
1 K Hospital
2 Bệnh viện K
3 National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
4 Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương
5 Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy
6 Trường Đại học Y Dược Hải Phòng
Corresponding author: khoa8668@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66iCD7.2427
19 Views
18 Downloads
Abstract

Objectives: Surveying the status of characteristics of functional scale of the quality of life and determining the affected factors of female genital cancer patients at National Cancer Hospital from August 2020 to September 2021.

Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on 700 female genital cancer patients using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionare.

Resuts: The highest mean score of physical function (79.0 ± 20.2); followed by perception (75.1 ± 24.4); emotional (73.0 ± 22.0), activity (64.1 ± 30.0) and social (63.4 ± 28.7) had the lowest. Factors affecting scores in functional domains include family/personal economics, cancer type, stage of disease, time of detection, comorbidities Conclusion: Measures are needed to improve functional scale of female genital cancer patients both during hospital treatment and after returning home.

References
[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. Google Scholar
[2]
Hubanks L, Kuyken W, Health WHOD of M. Quality of life assessment : an annotated bibliography [Internet]. World Health Organization; 1994 [cited 2022 Jan 13]. Report No.: WHO/MNH/PSF/94.1. Unpublished. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/61629 Google Scholar
[3]
Kim SI, Lee Y, Lim MC, Joo J, Park K, Lee DO, et al. Quality of life and sexuality comparison between sexually active ovarian cancer survivors and healthy women. J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(2):148–54. Google Scholar
[4]
Bifulco G, De Rosa N, Tornesello ML, Piccoli R, Bertrando A, Lavitola G, et al. Quality of life, lifestyle behavior and employment experience: a comparison between young and midlife survivors of gynecology early stage cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):444–51. Google Scholar
[5]
Fayers P, Bottomley A, EORTC Quality of Life Group, Quality of Life Unit. Quality of life research within the EORTC-the EORTC QLQ-C30. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 1990. 2002 Mar;38 Suppl 4:S125-133. Google Scholar
[6]
Ngọc ĐTB. Chất lượng cuộc sống của bệnh nhân ung thư tại khoa Ung bướu – Chăm sóc giảm nhẹ, Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội năm 2016 – 2017. [Hà Nội]: Đại Học Y Hà Nội; 2017. Google Scholar
[7]
Torkzahrani S, Rastegari L, Khodakarami N, Akbarzadeh-Baghian A, Alizadeh K. Quality of Life and its Related Factors Among Iranian Cervical Cancer Survivors. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Apr;15(4):320–3. Google Scholar
[8]
Lê Đại M, Dương Ngọc Lê M, Nguyễn Tiến Đ, Kim Bảo G, Bùi Vinh Q. Chất lượng cuộc sống của bệnh nhân được chẩn đoán hoặc nghi ngờ ung thư mới nhập viện và một số yếu tố liên quan. Tạp Chí Nghiên Cứu Học. 2020;126(2):187–96. Google Scholar
[9]
Huỳnh Nguyễn Phương Q, Nguyễn Thị Hồng T, Huỳnh Nguyễn Phương T. Chất lượng cuộc sống và một số yếu tố liên quan ở người bệnh ung thư điều trị tại bệnh viện ung bướu thành phố Cần Thơ năm 2020. Tạp Chí Học Dự Phòng. 2021;31(9):153–61. Google Scholar
[10]
Teng FF, Kalloger SE, Brotto L, McAlpine JN. Determinants of quality of life in ovarian cancer survivors: a pilot study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can JOGC J Obstet Gynecol Can JOGC. 2014 Aug;36(8):708–15. Google Scholar