Articles Vol. 66 No. CĐ7-HNKH Bệnh viện K 22/05/2025

18. ASSESSMENT OF THE CURRENT STATUS OF USING SUBCUTANEOUS INJECTION CHAIRS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ON-DEMAND TREATMENT, K HOSPITAL IN 2023

Dao Van Tu1,2, Vuong Hong Hanh1,2, Nguyen Van Ha1,2, Tran Minh Hai1,2, Dang Thi Hoa1,2
1 K Hospital, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital
2 Bệnh viện K
Corresponding author: vuonghanhbvk@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66iCD7.2399
28 Views
21 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: Characteristics and Current status of infusion chamber use at the On-Demand Treatment Department, K Hospital.

Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study of 74 patients diagnosed with cancer and treated at K Hospital. All  patients were placed with subcutaneous infusion chambers at the On-Demand Treatment Department, K Hospital.

Results: Patients had an average age of 56.4. The median BMI was 21. The majority of patients understood the role and operation of the infusion chamber, accounting for 95.9%. The average time from the day of infusion chamber placement to the day of outpatient treatment was 2.71 ± 5 days. The average time from the day of infusion chamber placement to the day of starting to use the chamber was 8.54 ± 9.01 days. The proportion of patients receiving infusion on the day of infusion chamber placement: 4/74, accounting for 5.4%. The proportion of patients receiving infusion 1 day after infusion chamber placement: 9/74, accounting for 12.2%. Rate of patients infused within 1-3 days after infusion chamber placement: 25/74, accounting for 33.8%. Rate of patients discharged on the day of infusion chamber placement: 48/74, accounting for 64.9%. Average time of infusion chamber use: 4.21 ± 4.45 days.

Conclusion: Our study did not record any complications in 74 patients with infusion chambers during the 9-month follow-up period; only 1 patient had an interruption in the infusion process due to needle displacement on the 2nd day of the treatment cycle.

References
[1]
Pronovost PJ. Ensuring That Guidelines Help Reduce Patient Harm. J Oncol Pract. 2013;9(4):e172-e173. doi:10.1200/JOP.2012.000780 Google Scholar
[2]
Grassi L. Psychiatric and psychosocial implications in cancer care: the agenda of psycho-oncology. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29:e89. doi:10.1017/S2045796019000829 Google Scholar
[3]
Ns K, W Y, Z M. Oncology Critical Care Nurse’s Knowledge about Insertion, Care and Complications of Venous Port Catheters in Egypt. Adv Pract Nurs. 2017;02(02). doi:10.4172/2573-0347.1000137 Google Scholar
[4]
D’Souza PC, Kumar S, Kakaria A, et al. Use of port-a-cath in cancer patients: a single-center experience. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8(11):1476-1482. doi:10.3855/jidc.4155 Google Scholar
[5]
Madabhavi I, Patel A, Sarkar M, Anand A, Panchal H, Parikh S. A Study of Use of “PORT” Catheter in Patients with Cancer: A Single-Center Experience. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2017;11:117955491769103. doi:10.1177/1179554917691031 Google Scholar