Articles Vol. 66 No. CĐ7-HNKH Bệnh viện K 22/05/2025

7. RESULTS OF PATIENT CARE AFTER PANCREATOPHODEAL REMOVAL SURGERY AT VIET DUC FRIENDSHIP HOSPITAL IN 2024-2025.

Nguyen Ba Anh1,2, Le Tu Hoang1,2, Trinh Hong Son1,2, Tran Thi Ngoc2,3, Nguyen Thi Thu Hang2,3, Dao Thi Thu Hang2,3
1 VietDuc University Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Hữu Nghị Việt Đức
3 Viet Duc University Hospital
Corresponding author: nguyenbavuong09081982@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v66iCD7.2386
36 Views
16 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: Describe the results of patient care after pancreaticoduodenectomy at the On-Demand Treatment Department and the Oncology - Radiation Therapy Department of  Viet Duc Hospital. Method: Prospective descriptive study was conducted from 3/2024-3/2025 on 20 patients who met the selection criteria. Results: Average age of patients 61,25 (46-79). Male 85%, female 15%. Average surgery time (402.5 ± 115.9) minutes. Postoperative pain levels (VAS) at 6 hours; 12 hours and 24 hours were: (2.9 ± 0.8) points; (2.8 ± 0.7) points and (2.5 ± 0.6) points, respectively. Length of stay hospital (18.3 ± 4.9) days. Patients had flatus (4.3 ± 1.5) days; Time of gastric tube was removed (4.4 ± 1.6) days. Time of drainage removal was (13.4 ± 6.5) days. Patients mobilized early outside bed after surgery (2.6 ± 0.6) days. Patients were fed orally for (5.5 ± 1.4) days. Rate of postoperative complications: There were 2 (10%) cases of postoperative bleeding, of which 1 (5%) case required reoperation and 1 (5%) case required embolization. There was 1 (5%) case of postoperative infection requiring re-hospitalization.Conclusion: Postoperative patient care results were good in 90%, average in 5% and poor in 5%.

References
[1]
Nguyễn Thị Chinh, Ngô Ánh Ngọc, Đậu Thị Huyền và CS (2023). Đánh giá kết quả chăm sóc người bệnh sau phẫu thuật cắt khối tá tụy tại Khoa ngoại Gan Mật Tụy - Bệnh viện K. Tạp chí Y học cộng đồng trang 135-140 ISSN 2354-0613. 2023 Google Scholar
[2]
Trần Mạnh Hùng (2021). Kết quả phẫu thuật cắt khối tá tuỵ bảo tồn môn vị tại Bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam số 1 tháng 3/2021. Trang 124-128. Google Scholar
[3]
Đào Quang Minh*, Vũ Thành Chung*, Vũ Khang Ninh* và CS (2018). Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật cắt khối tá tụy với miệng nối tụy - dạ dày. http://vasld.com.vn/danh-gia-ket-qua-phau-thuat-cat-khoi-ta-tuy-voi-mieng-noi-tuy-da-day. Google Scholar
[4]
Vũ Bá Quỳnh, Lê Cẩm Linh, Phùng Kim Yến và CS (2020).Đánh giá kết quả chăm sóc bệnh nhân sau phẫu thuật cắt khối tá tụy. Tạp chí Y dược lâm sàng 108 Tr 272-278. Google Scholar
[5]
Lê Văn Thành, Triệu Triều Dương, Vũ Văn Quang và CS (2021). Kết quả cắt khối tá tuỵ, vét hạch tiêu chuẩn điều trị các khối u vùng đầu tuỵ. Tạp chí Y dược lâm sàng 108 trang 214-220. Google Scholar
[6]
Andreas Andreou, Pauline Aeschbacher (2021).The Impact of Patient Age ≥80 Years on Postoperative Outcomes and Treatment Costs Following Pancreatic Surgery. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(4), 696; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040696 Google Scholar
[7]
Claudio B et al (2017). The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pencreatic fistula: 11 years After. Surgery 161 (3):584-591. Google Scholar
[8]
Tommaso Giuliani, Giampaolo, Ravinder Kang et al (2023). Current perioperative care in pancreatoduodenectomy: A Step- By - Step surgical roadmap from firt virist to discharge. Cancers 2023,15,2499.https://doi.orrg/10.3390/cancers15092499. Google Scholar