Articles Vol. 62 No. 7 (2021) 09/12/2021

FAILURE RATE OF EXTRA-ALVEOLAR BONE MINI-IMPLANT IN ORTHODONTIC: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Ngo Viet Thanh1,2, Nguyen Thi Thu Phuong3,4, Le Thi Thu Hai5,6
1 Thai Nguyen University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2 Trường Đại học Y Dược Thái Nguyên
3 Ha Noi Medical University
4 Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội
5 108 Military Central Hospital
6 Bệnh viện Trung ương quân đội 108
Corresponding author: ngovietthanh@tnmc.edu.vn
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v62i7 (2021).218
16 Views
0 Downloads
Keywords
Extra-alveolar bone mini-implant, systematic review, failure rate.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the scientific evidence related to the failure rate of extra-alveolar bone mini-implant in orthodontic.

Materials and methods: An electronic searched for articles on the databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar to identify all peer-reviewed articles potentially relevant to the review based on PIOCS framework. Methodological limitations were highlighted and the quality of articles was scored using tools such as: Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for cohort studies and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled clinical trials. Meta-analysis was conducted with selected article.

RESULTS: Sample sizes of each study ranged from 30 to 840 patients, with 55 to 1680 mini-implants. Most of studies used 2 mm diameter and 8-12 mm length mini-implants, immediately loaded with 8-14 oz. The failure rate of IZC mini-implant ranged from 6.3% to 27.3% while this percentage of BC mini-implant was 7.2% to 68.7%. The meta-analysis showed that there was no significant relationship of the failure rate between the left and the right side.

Conclusion: Althought the failure of extra-alveolar bone mini-implant was low in almost research, it needs more randomized controlled clinical trial studies to evaluate exactly.

References
[1]
Park, J.H. and ed, Temporary Anchorage Devices in Clinical Orthodontics. 2020, Hobeken, NJ: WIley-Blackwell. Google Scholar
[2]
Paik, C.-H., et al., Orthodontics Miniscrew Implants: Clinical Applications. 1 ed. 2009, London: Elsevier. Google Scholar
[3]
Chen, C.H., et al., The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006. 64(8): p. 1209-13. Google Scholar
[4]
Jawalekar, D.R., et al., COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF CORTICAL BONE THICKNESS AT INFRAZYGOMATIC CREST, BUCCAL SHELF AREA, ANTERIOR MAXILLA FOR PLACEMENT OF BONE SCREWS IN NORMODIVERGENT, HYPODIVERGENT AND HYPERDIVERGENT PATIENTS PROTOCOL FOR CBCT STUDY. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2021. 8(3): p. 3180-3193. Google Scholar
[5]
Chang, C.H., J.S. Lin, and W.E. Roberts, Failure rates for stainless steel versus titanium alloy infrazygomatic crest bone screws: A single-center, randomized double-blind clinical trial. The Angle Orthodontist, 2019. 89(1): p. 40-46. Google Scholar
[6]
Hsu, E., et al., Comparison of the Failure Rate for InfraZygomatic Bone Screws Placed in Movable Mucosa or Attached Gingiva. Int J Orthod Implantol, 2017. 47: p. 96-106. Google Scholar
[7]
Arqub, S.A., et al., Survival estimates and risk factors for failure of palatal and buccal mini-implants. Angle Orthod, 2021. Google Scholar
[8]
Chang, C., S.S. Liu, and W.E. Roberts, Primary failure rate for 1680 extra-alveolar mandibular buccal shelf mini-screws placed in movable mucosa or attached gingiva. Angle Orthod, 2015. 85(6): p. 905-10. Google Scholar
[9]
Jia, X., X. Chen, and X. Huang, Influence of orthodontic mini-implant penetration of the maxillary sinus in the infrazygomatic crest region. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2018. 153(5): p. 656-661. Google Scholar
[10]
Mohan, R. and R.K. Jain, Survival Analysis of Extra-Alveolar Tads Used for Orthodontic Anchorage. Biosc.Biotech.res.Comm. , 2020. 13: p. 59-64. Google Scholar
[11]
Tseng, Y.C., et al., Resonance frequency analysis of miniscrew implant stability. J Oral Sci, 2018. 60(1): p. 64-69. Google Scholar
[12]
Uribe, F., et al., Failure rates of mini-implants placed in the infrazygomatic region. Progress in orthodontics, 2015. 16: p. 31-31. Google Scholar
[13]
Azeem, M., et al., Failure rates of mini-implants inserted in the retromolar area. International Orthodontics, 2019. 17(1): p. 53-59. Google Scholar
[14]
Park, H.S., S.H. Jeong, and O.W. Kwon, Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006. 130(1): p. 18-25. Google Scholar
[15]
Kravitz, N.D. and B. Kusnoto, Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2014. 131(4 Suppl): p. S43-51. Google Scholar
[16]
Mecenas, P., et al., Stainless steel or titanium mini-implants? Angle Orthod, 2020. 90(4): p. 587-597. Google Scholar