Articles Vol. 65 No. 6 30/10/2024

1. PREVALENCE AND RISK FACTORS OF TINEA PEDIS IN SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS IN NGHE AN PROVINCE (2022)

Duong Thi Khanh Linh1,2, Le Tran Anh3,4, Tang Xuan Hai5,6
1 TTH Nghe An General Hospital
2 Bệnh viện TTH Nghệ An
3 Vietnam Military Medical Academy
4 Học viện Quân y
5 Nghe An Obstetrics and Pediatrics
6 Bệnh viện Sản Nhi Nghệ An
Corresponding author: Duonglinhna93@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65i6.1557
18 Views
16 Downloads
Abstract

Objectives: The study was conducted on 787 small business owners in Nghe An province to determine the prevalence and related factors for tinea pedis.

Methods: A descriptive research method, direct examination in 20% KOH media and fungal culture in Saboraud medium with pH < 5.5 and antibiotics were employed. Fungal species were determined based on species identification key.

Results: The prevalence of tinea pedis was 15.8%, increasing by age, specifically 5.73% in the age group ≤ 39 years old, 10.65% in the age group of 40 - 49 years old, and 36.11% in the age group ≥ 50 years old. Multivariate correlation analysis showed some factors associated with tinea pedis, including age group ≥ 50 with [OR = 2.65, 95%CI: 1.70 – 4.13, p < 0.01] and people with seafood trading with [OR = 1.79, 95%CI: 1.04 – 3.08 p < 0.05].

Conclusions: The prevalence of tinea pedis in the small business owners in Nghe An was 15.5%. There was a relationship between age, seafood trading and tinea pedis.

References
[1]
Waterson, L. (2017). Fungal infections: tinea pedis and onychomycosis. AJP CPD, 7. Google Scholar
[2]
Roseeuw, D. (1999). Achilles foot screening project: preliminary results of patients screened by dermatologists. Journal of the European Google Scholar
[3]
Academy of Dermatology and Venereology: JEADV, 12 Suppl 1, S6-9; discussion S17. Google Scholar
[4]
Phạm Thị Lan, & Nguyễn Phương Hoa. (2012). Tình hình bệnh nấm nông trên da tại bệnh viện da liễu Trung ương. Y học Việt Nam, pp. 73–76. Google Scholar
[5]
Perea, S., Ramos, M. J., Garau, M., Gonzalez, A., Noriega, A. R., & del Palacio, A. (2000). Prevalence and risk factors of tinea unguium and tinea pedis in the general population in Spain. Journal f Clinical Microbiology, 38(9), 3226–3230. Google Scholar
[6]
Simonnet, C., Berger, F., & Gantier, J.-C. (2011). Epidemiology of superficial fungal diseases in French Guiana: a three-year retrospective analysis. Medical Mycology, 49(6), 608–611. Google Scholar
[7]
Szepietowski, J. C., Reich, A., Garlowska, E., Kulig, M., & Baran, E. (2006). Factors influencing coexistence of toenail onychomycosis with tinea pedis and other dermatomycoses: a survey of 2761 patients. Archives of Dermatology, 142(10), 1279–1284. Google Scholar
[8]
Leung, A. K. C., Lam, J. M., Leong, K. F., Hon, K. L., Barankin, B., Leung, A. A. M., & Wong, A. H. C. (2020). Onychomycosis: An Updated Review. Inflammation & Allergy Drug Targets, 14(1), 32–45. Google Scholar
[9]
Toukabri, N., Dhieb, C., El Euch, D., Rouissi, M., Mokni, M., & Sadfi-Zouaoui, N. (2017). Prevalence, Etiology, and Risk Factors of Tinea Pedis and Tinea Unguium in Tunisia. The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology = Journal Canadien Des Maladies Infectieuses Et De La Microbiologie Medicale, 2017, 6835725. Google Scholar
[10]
Järv, H., Naaber, P., Kaur, S., Eisen, M., & Silm, H. (2004). Toenail onychomycosis in Estonia. Mycoses, 47(1–2), 57–61. Google Scholar
[11]
El Fekih, N., Belghith, I., Trabelsi, S., Skhiri-Aounallah, H., Khaled, S., & Fazaa, B. (2012). Epidemiological and etiological study of foot mycosis in Tunisia. Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas, 103(6), 520–524. Google Scholar
[12]
Djeridane, A., Djeridane, Y., & Ammar‐Khodja, A. (2006). Epidemiological and aetiological study on tinea pedis and onychomycosis in Algeria. Mycoses, 49(3), 190–196. Google Scholar
[13]
Morishita, N., Ninomiya, J., Sei, Y., & Takiuchi, I. (2003). [Effects of temperature, humidity, minor injury and washing on penetration of dermatophytes into human stratum corneum]. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi Japanese Journal of Medical Mycology, 44(4), 269–271. Google Scholar