Articles Vol. 65 No. CĐ 8 - Trường ĐH Nguyễn Tất Thành 09/09/2024

35. MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS RETURNED TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT UNPLANNED WITHIN 72 HOURS AT TAN PHU DISTRICT HOSPITAL, IN 2019

Luong Van Sinh1,2, Bui Thi Nhi1,2, Hoang Thi Phuong Thao1,2
1 Tan Phu Dist Hospital
2 Bệnh viện quận Tân Phú
Corresponding author: Drsinh2001@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD8.1490
17 Views
3 Downloads
Abstract

Backgrounds: Describe the management results of patients returning to the Emergency Department unplanned within 72 hours and some correlated factors at Tan Phu Dist Hospital, 2019.

Methods: A retrospective study collected patient data at the Emergency Department, Tan Phu Dist Hospital using Hsoft hospital management software from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019.

Results: There were 22,417 eligible patients, and 340 patients returned within 72 hours, accounting for 1.5%. Some differences between the two groups of patients who returned and did not return to the emergency department within 72 hours: The group of patients who returned had a higher average age of 49 ± 19 (p < 0.01), more women than men (p < 0.01), higher health insurance payments (p < 0.001), longer emergency hospital stay (p < 0.01) and a higher proportion of hospital stays over 120 minutes (p < 0.01). Intestinal infections, dengue fever, vestibular disorders, hypertension, and digestive disorders had a higher rate (p < 0.01). The group of patients who returned to the emergency department and had to be hospitalized was 71.18%. Patients with health insurance, diagnosed with 1 of 5 diseases (intestinal infection, vestibular disorder, dengue fever, hypertension, and digestive disorder) had a higher risk of return than other diseases (p < 0.05). Patients with a hospital stay in the emergency department ≥ 120 minutes had an OR = 1.31, p < 0.05 compared with the group < 120 minutes.

Conclusions: The management results of patients returning to the emergency department within 72 hours showed a trend towards older patients, women, using health insurance, longer emergency hospital stays, and five medical conditions including intestinal infections, vestibular disorders, dengue fever, hypertension, digestive disorders.

References
[1]
Alberto Jiménez Puente, Antonio Lara-Blanquer, et al (2015) "Causes of 72-hour return visits to hospital emergency departments". Emergencias, 27, 287-293. Google Scholar
[2]
Amy Hui Sian Chan, Shu Fang Ho, et al (2016) "Characteristics of patients who made a return visit within 72 hours to the emergency department of a Singapore tertiary hospital". Singapor Med J, 57 (6), 301-306 Google Scholar
[3]
CP Ng, CH Chung (2003) "An analysis of unscheduled return visits to the accident and emergency department of a general public hospital". Google Scholar
[4]
Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(3) Google Scholar
[5]
Debra White (5/2010) Seventy Two Hour Emergency Department Returns, Master of Nursing, Washington state university, 3. Google Scholar
[6]
Guan Lin Goh, Peiqi Huang, et al (6/2016) "Unplanned reattendances at the paediatric emergency department within 72 hours: A one-year experience in KKH". Singapore Med J 57 (6), 307-313. Google Scholar
[7]
Hassan Barzegari, Mohammad Ali Fahimi, Schwann Dehghanian, et al (2017) "Emergency Department Readmission Rate within 72 Hours after Discharge; a Letter to Editor". Emerg (Teharan), 5 (2), 64. Google Scholar
[8]
Julius Cuong Pham, Thomas Dean Kirsch, et al (4/2011) "Seventy-two-hour Returns May Not be a Good Indicator of Safety in the Emergency Department: A National Study". Acad EmergMed, 18 (4), 390-397. Google Scholar
[9]
Lisa Calder, Anita Pozgay, et al (2/2015) "Adverse events in patients with return emergency department visits". BMJ Qual Saf 24 (2), 142–148. Google Scholar
[10]
Mazen El Sayed, Elsy Jabbour, et al (1/2016) "Discharge Against Medical Advice From the Emergency Department: Results From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Beirut, Lebanon". Medicine, 95(6) Google Scholar
[11]
S Nunez, A Hexdall, et al (2006) "Unscheduled returns to the emergency department: An outcome of medical errors?". Qual Saf Health Care 15, 102–108. Google Scholar