Articles Vol. 65 No. CĐ 8 - Trường ĐH Nguyễn Tất Thành 09/09/2024

24. DIAGNOSIS TREE FOR PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN OVER 50 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT AT MEDIC MEDICAL CENTER

Nguyen Chi Cuong1,2, Nguyen Minh Thien1,2, Nguyen Truong Vien3,4, Ho Hoang Vu5,6, Tran Ngoc Dang5,6, Huynh Nghia5,6, To Gia Kien5,6
1 MEDIC Medical Center
2 Trung tâm Y khoa MEDIC
3 Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine
4 Trường Đại học Y khoa Phạm Ngọc Thạch
5 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh
6 Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
Corresponding author: Drcuongmedic@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD8.1474
22 Views
10 Downloads
Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer diagnosis (PCa) has potential for improvement through algorithms combining clinical and paraclinical information. This study aims to develop a PCa diagnostic tree based on data from men over 50 with biopsy indications.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the MEDIC Medical Center from 2020 to 2023. Retrospective records of men ≥50 with lower urinary tract symptoms and biopsy indications were analyzed. Patients who were indicated for biopsy due to suspected PCa via digital rectal examination (DRE) or tPSA≥4ng/ml according to Vietnam Ministry of Health guidelines were selected, excluding cases with concurrent other cancers.

Results: The diagnostic tree based on tPSA, DRE, TRUS achieved stable performance on both training and internal validation sets with sensitivity over 90%, specificity over 70%, positive predictive value over 70%, negative predictive value over 95%, and accuracy over 80%. ư

Conclusion: The developed diagnostic tree ensures reliability and practical applicability in clinical settings. Furthermore, TRUS makes a greater contribution than MRI in the diagnostic tree of PCa, and the simultaneous use of TRUS and MRI may not be necessary.

References
[1]
Bộ Y tế, Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị ung thư tuyến tiền liệt. Quyết định số 3130/QĐ-BYT. 2020:tr.4-7. Google Scholar
[2]
Hội Tiết Niệu và Thận học Việt Nam, Phác đồ hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị ung thư tuyến tiền liệt, 2020. Google Scholar
[3]
Keeney, S S, M MR, et al., Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in the UK: A Decision Model Analysis Based on the CAP Trial. Pharmacoeconomics. Dec 2022;40(12):1207-1220. doi:10.1007/s40273-022-01191-1 Google Scholar
[4]
American Cancer Society, Prostate cancer: Early Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/prostate-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/, Accessed access on 27Feb2021. Google Scholar
[5]
Võ Hiếu Thành, Nguyễn Minh Thiền, Phan Thanh Hải, Tương quan mô bệnh học và tổn thương PI-RADS (3,4,5) phiên bản 2: Hồi cứu 47 trường hợp. Vol. 22. 2018:115. Chuyên đề Hội nghị KHKT Bệnh viện Bình Dân. Google Scholar
[6]
Vũ Lê Chuyên, Đào Quang Oánh, Đỗ Anh Toàn, Khảo sát tỷ lệ ung thư tuyến tiền liệt ở nam giới trên 50 tuổi đến khám tại bệnh viện Bình Dân, X., 16 (2012) tr. 335-342. Y Học TP Hồ Chí Minh. 2012;16:tr. 335-342. Google Scholar
[7]
Garzotto M, Beer TM, Hudson RG et al., Improved detection of prostate cancer using classification and regression tree analysis. J Clin Google Scholar
[8]
Oncol. Jul 1 2005;23(19):4322-9. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.11.136 Google Scholar
[9]
Boesen L, Nørgaard N, Løgager V et al., Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men. Eur Urol Oncol. May 2019;2(3):311-319. doi:10.1016/j.euo.2018.09.001 Google Scholar