Introduction: Patient experience during service use is one of the important factors that enhance the quality of the services.
Objectives: This study was conducted to assess the current outpatient experiences with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) services and its associated factors in Vinmec Nha Trang International Hospital in 2023.
Methods: We applied a cross-sectional design to perform self-administered interviews with 185 outpatients in Vinmec Nha Trang International Hospital during May-June, 2023.
Results: 77.9% of outpatients had a positive assessment of the MRI services. The two aspects that outpatients have the lowest rate of positive assessments are the Experience of performing MRI (53.4%) and the Experience of communication skills of health workers (74.6%). The four remaining aspects of the experience have a high rate of positive assessment ranging from 80-88%. 91.4% of outpatients reported that they could come back to re-use the services if needed. Regarding associated factors, having health insurance and used MRI services were positively related to experiences with MRI services.
Conclusions: Outpatients had a high rate of positive assessment of the MRI services. Our study recommends improving the consultancy and patient support before and after performing MRI.
31. OUT-PATIENT EXPERIENCE WITH MRI SERVICES IN VINMEC NHA TRANG INTERNATIONAL HOSPITAL IN 2023
29
Views
6
Downloads
Keywords
Patient experience, Outpatient, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Vinmec Nha Trang international Hospital.
Abstract
References
[1]
Bộ Y tế, Kế hoạch triển khai thực hiện “Đổi mới phong cách, thái độ phục vụ của cán bộ y tế hướng tới sự hài lòng của người bệnh”, Bộ Y tế, chủ biên, Hà Nội, 2015.
Google Scholar
[2]
Bộ Y tế, Bộ tiêu chí chất lượng bệnh viện Việt Nam (phiên bản 2.0), chủ biên, Hà Nội, 2016.
Google Scholar
[3]
Đàm Thị Tám Hương và các cộng sự, Khảo sát trải nghiệm khách hàng điều trị nội trú tại Bệnh viện Trưng Vương năm 2019, 2019.
Google Scholar
[4]
Huỳnh Mỹ Thư, Trải nghiệm của người bệnh khám chữa bệnh ngoại trú và một số yếu tố ảnh hưởng tại bệnh viện quận Thủ Đức Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh năm 2020, Thạc sỹ quản lý bệnh viện, Trường đại Học Y tế công cộng, 2020.
Google Scholar
[5]
Nguyễn Thị Huyền Trâm, Trải nghiệm của bệnh nhân điều trị nội trú tại Khoa Ngoại, Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội năm 2018 và một số yếu tố liên quan, Luận văn thạc sỹ, Trường ĐH Y Hà Nội, 2018.
Google Scholar
[6]
Sở Y tế thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Kết quả khảo sát trải nghiệm người bệnh nội trú 6 tháng cuối năm 2019, 2020, truy cập ngày-20/8/2023, tại trang web http://www.medinet.hochiminhcity. gov.vn/chuyen-muc/ket-qua-khao-sat-trai- nghiem-nguoi-benh-noi-tru-6-thang-cuoi-nam- 2019-c8-22649.aspx.
Google Scholar
[7]
Sở Y tế thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, Kết quả khảo sát trải nghiệm người bệnh nội trú năm 2020, 2021, truy cập ngày-20/8/2023, tại trang web http://mekonghospital.vn/index.php/gioi-thieu/ gioi-thieu-benh-vien/282-kt-qu-kho-sat-tri- nghim-ca-ngi-bnh-trong-thi-gian-iu-tr-ni-tru-ti- cac-bnh-vin-tren-a-ban-thanh-ph-h-chi-minh- trong-nm-2020.html.
Google Scholar
[8]
Yuhua B, Guanrong F, Dongdong Z et al., Patient experience with outpatient encounters at public hospitals in Shanghai: Examining different aspects of physician services and implications of overcrowding, PLoS One, 12(2), 2017.
Google Scholar
[9]
C Doyle, L Lennox, D Bell et al., A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness, BMJ Open, 3(1), 2013, p. e001570.
Google Scholar
[10]
Ruth E , Stuart T, Sam J et al., Patient experience and perceived acceptability of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging for staging colorectal and lung cancer compared with current staging scans: a qualitative study, BMJ Open, 7(9), 2017, p. e016391.
Google Scholar
[11]
E Funk, P Thunberg, A Anderzen-Carlsson, Patients’ experiences in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and their experiences of breath holding techniques, J Adv Nurs, 70(8), 2014, p. 1880-90.
Google Scholar
[12]
Lisa LH, Lisa JM, Allison WB et al., Medical Imaging Outpatients’ Experiences With Receiving Information Required for Informed Consent and Preparation: A Cross-Sectional Study, J Patient Exp, 5(4), 2018, p. 296-302.
Google Scholar
[13]
Sherri LL, Andrew SG, Evaluation and measurement of patient experience, Patient Experience Journal, 1(1), 2014, p. 28-36.
Google Scholar
[14]
Rui M, Lu L, Chunyan Z et al., Evaluation of patient experience in county-level public hospitals in China: a multicentred, cross-sectional study, BMJ Open, 9(11), 2019, p. e034225.
Google Scholar
[15]
The Health Foundation Inspiring Improvement, Measuring patient experience, Evidence scan, 2013.
Google Scholar
[16]
World Health Organization, Strengthening medical imaging, 2020, truy cập ngày-20/8/2023, tại trang web https://www.who.int/activities/ strengthening-medical-imaging.
Google Scholar
[17]
Zachary M, Zoe J, The patient experience of high technology medical imaging: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence, Radiography, 17(4), 2011, p. 323-331.
Google Scholar
[18]
Zachary M, Alan P, Zoe J et al., Patient anxiety and satisfaction in a magnetic resonance imaging department: initial results from an action research study, Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 46(1), 2015, p. 23-29.
Google Scholar
[19]
Jinzhu X, Yinhuan H, Chuntao L et al., What Are the Risk Factors of Negative Patient Experience? A Cross-Sectional Study in Chinese Public Hospitals, INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 56, 2019, p. 0046958019847865.
Google Scholar