Articles Vol. 65 No. 4 10/06/2024

11. OUTCOMES OF CT-SCANNER DIAGNOSIS ACUTE PANCREASITIS WITH FLUID COLLECTIONS AT MILITARY HOSPITAL 103

Ho Chi Thanh1,2, Lai Ba Thanh1,2
1 Military Hospital 103
2 Bệnh viện Quân y 103
Corresponding author: hochithanhbv103@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65i4.1198
28 Views
18 Downloads
Abstract

Aim: Evaluation of the value of CT-scanner to diagnose acute pancreatitis with fluid collection.

Objects and methods: Study of 181 acute pancreatitis with fluid collection treated by ultrasound – guided percutaneous catheter drainage at Military Hospital 103 from January 2021 to May 2023. The patient undergone multiple detector scan of abdomen with contrast in the first day. The examination, diagnosis, and treatment according to the guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) 2019.

Results: CT-Scanner with contrast agent, Balthazar grade E was the most (56.9%), followed by grade D and C (28.7% and 13.8%), there was 1 case of grade B. Correct diagnosis of acute necrotizing pancreatitis was 98.1%, sensitivity was 82.1%, specificity was 96.5%, positive predictive value was 98.1%, negative predictive value was 71.8% and Kappa index was 0.73. Clinically appropriate CTSI index was 71.8%, of which 94.1% was suitable for mild level, 65.3% for moderate level and 56.3% for severe level.

Conclusions: CT-Scanner with contrast agent to diagnose acute necrotizing pancreatitis has high sensitivity and specificity, however, the accuracy rate of using CTSI indext to reflex the disease condition was low. Therefore, patient should be taken CT-Scanner again after 72 hours of admission for a more accurate diagnosis.

References
[1]
Leppäniemi A, Tolonen M, Tarasconi A et al., Google Scholar
[2]
WSES guidelines for the management of severe Google Scholar
[3]
acute pancreatitis. World J Emerg Surg, 14, (27), Google Scholar
[4]
Balthazar EJ et al., Acute pancreatitis: value of Google Scholar
[5]
CT in establishing prognosis, Radiology. 174(2), Google Scholar
[6]
-336, 1990 Google Scholar
[7]
Freeny PC, Hauptmann E, Althaus SJ et al., Google Scholar
[8]
Percutaneous CT-guided catheter drainage of Google Scholar
[9]
infected acute necrotizing pancreatitis: Google Scholar
[10]
techniques and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol; Google Scholar
[11]
: 969 – 975, 1998 Google Scholar
[12]
Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C et al., Google Scholar
[13]
Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: Google Scholar
[14]
revision of the Atlanta classification and Google Scholar
[15]
definitions by international consensus. Gut. Google Scholar
[16]
(1): 102-11, 2013. Google Scholar
[17]
Balthazar EJ, Acute Pancreatitis: Assessment of Google Scholar
[18]
Severity with Clinical and CT Evaluation, Google Scholar
[19]
Radiology, 223: 603–613, 2002. Google Scholar
[20]
Yadav AK, Sharma R, Kandasamy D et al., Google Scholar
[21]
Perfusion CT: Can it predict the development of Google Scholar
[22]
pancreatic necrosis in early stage of severe acute Google Scholar
[23]
pancreatitis. Abdominal Imaging,. DOI: Google Scholar
[24]
1007/s00261-014-0226-6, 2014. Google Scholar
[25]
Working Group IAP, APA Acute Pancreatitis Google Scholar
[26]
Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines Google Scholar
[27]
for the management of acute pancreatitis, Google Scholar
[28]
Pancreatology; 13(4 Suppl 2), e1-15, 2013 Google Scholar
[29]
Fung C, Svystun O, Fouladi DF et al., CT Google Scholar
[30]
imaging, classification, and complications of Google Scholar
[31]
acute pancreatitis. Abdominal Imaging, DOI: Google Scholar
[32]
1007/s00261-019-02236-4. 2019 Google Scholar
[33]
Urooj T, Shoukat S, Bokhari I et al., Diagnostic Google Scholar
[34]
accuracy of contrast enhanced computed Google Scholar
[35]
tomography (CECT) in detection of necrosis in Google Scholar
[36]
acute pancreatitis by taking surgical findings as Google Scholar
[37]
gold standard, J Pak Med Assoc, 70(11),1930- Google Scholar
[38]
[39]
Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L et al., A Google Scholar
[40]
modified CT severity index for evaluating acute Google Scholar
[41]
pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient Google Scholar
[42]
outcome, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 183(5):1261-5, Google Scholar