Articles Vol. 65 No. CĐ 4 - Hội Y học Giới tính Việt Nam 30/05/2024

35. IMPROVING QUALITY OF LIFE AND PSYCHOSOCIAL HEALTH FOR PENILE CANCER AFTER ENDOSCOPIC LYMPHADENECTOMY

Tran Doan Thien Quoc1,2,3,4, Dang Quang Tuan1,3, Nguyen Cong Minh1,2,3,4, Mai Ba Tien Dung1,2,3,4
1 Binh Dan Hospital
2 Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine
3 Bệnh viện Bình Dân Tp.HCM
4 Trường Đại học Y khoa Phạm Ngọc Thạch
Corresponding author: quoctran88@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD4.1184
13 Views
6 Downloads
Keywords
Penile cancer, video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy, Quality of life.
Abstract

Background: Penile cancer is a rare but aggressive squamous cell carcinoma affecting the male genitalia. Penile cancer’s psychological impact extends beyond diagnosis, encompassing the consequences of treatment and unique cancer-related distress.

Aims: To Improve Quality of Life and Psychosocial Health for Penile Cancer after endoscopic lymphadenectomy at Binh Dan hospital.

Materials and Methods: It is a cohort study with 14 patients, at 2022. Data analyzed included quality of life, psychosocial effects, urinary symptoms, and sexual function.

Results: minimally invasive endoscopic lymphadenectomy improved QoL, but did not improving sexual function and urinary problems.

Conclusions:Minimally invasive treatment methods, including endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer, help preserve higher QoL.. Personal support, including educational solutions, group support and family counseling, is essential to recovery from treatment.

References
[1]
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE et al., Cancer Google Scholar
[2]
Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7- Google Scholar
[3]
doi:10.3322/caac.21654 Google Scholar
[4]
Sharma P, Zargar H, Spiess PE. Surgical Google Scholar
[5]
Advances in Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Google Scholar
[6]
Optimizing Treatment Outcomes. Urologic Google Scholar
[7]
Clinics of North America. 2016;43(4):457-468. Google Scholar
[8]
doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2016.06.007 Google Scholar
[9]
Dorff TB, Ballas LK, Schuckman AK. Current Google Scholar
[10]
Management Strategy for Penile Cancer Google Scholar
[11]
and Future Directions. Curr Oncol Rep. Google Scholar
[12]
;19(8):54. doi:10.1007/s11912-017-0615-4 Google Scholar
[13]
Importance of Addressing the Psychosocial Google Scholar
[14]
Impact of Penile Cancer on Patients and Their Google Scholar
[15]
Families - ScienceDirect. Accessed May 12, 2024. Google Scholar
[16]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ Google Scholar
[17]
abs/pii/S0749208122000390?via%3Dihub Google Scholar
[18]
Maddineni SB, Lau MM, Sangar VK. Identifying Google Scholar
[19]
the needs of penile cancer sufferers: A systematic Google Scholar
[20]
review of the quality of life, psychosexual and Google Scholar
[21]
psychosocial literature in penile cancer. BMC Google Scholar
[22]
Urology. 2009;9(1):8. doi:10.1186/1471-2490- Google Scholar
[23]
-8 Google Scholar
[24]
Kumar V, Sethia KK. Prospective study Google Scholar
[25]
comparing video-endoscopic radical inguinal Google Scholar
[26]
lymph node dissection (VEILND) with open Google Scholar
[27]
radical ILND (OILND) for penile cancer over Google Scholar
[28]
an 8-year period. BJU Int. 2017;119(4):530-534. Google Scholar
[29]
doi:10.1111/bju.13660 Google Scholar
[30]
Hakenberg OW, Compérat EM, Minhas S et al., Google Scholar
[31]
EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Google Scholar
[32]
Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):142-150. doi:10.1016/j. Google Scholar
[33]
eururo.2014.10.017 Google Scholar
[34]
Cross-cultural development of an EORTC Google Scholar
[35]
questionnaire to assess health-related quality of Google Scholar
[36]
life in patients with testicular cancer: the EORTC Google Scholar
[37]
QLQ-TC26 - PMC. Accessed May 12, 2024. Google Scholar
[38]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/ Google Scholar
[39]
PMC3576569/ Google Scholar
[40]
Singh V, Yadav R, Sinha RJ et al., Prospective Google Scholar
[41]
comparison of quality-of-life outcomes Google Scholar
[42]
between ileal conduit urinary diversion and Google Scholar
[43]
orthotopic neobladder reconstruction after Google Scholar
[44]
radical cystectomy: a statistical model. BJU Int. Google Scholar
[45]
;113(5):726-732. doi:10.1111/bju.12440272 Google Scholar
[46]
Efficace F, Bottomley A, van Andel G. Health Google Scholar
[47]
related quality of life in prostate carcinoma Google Scholar
[48]
patients: a systematic review of randomized Google Scholar
[49]
controlled trials. Cancer. 2003;97(2):377-388. Google Scholar
[50]
doi:10.1002/cncr.11065 Google Scholar
[51]
Miret C, Orive M, Sala M et al., Reference values Google Scholar
[52]
of EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23, and Google Scholar
[53]
EQ-5D-5L for women with non-metastatic breast Google Scholar
[54]
cancer at diagnosis and 2 years after. Qual Life Google Scholar
[55]
Res. 2023;32(4):989-1003. doi:10.1007/s11136- Google Scholar
[56]
-03327-4 Google Scholar
[57]
Bullen K, Matthews S, Edwards S et al., Google Scholar
[58]
Exploring men’s experiences of penile cancer Google Scholar
[59]
surgery to improve rehabilitation. Nurs Times. Google Scholar
[60]
;105(12):20-24. Google Scholar