Articles Vol. 65 No. CĐ 4 - Hội Y học Giới tính Việt Nam 30/05/2024

24. NODE TREATMENT IN PENIS CANCER TREATMENT: OVERVIEW

Nguyen Huu Thao1,2, Nguyen Quang1,2, Trinh Hoang Giang1,2, Nguyen Tien Dung3,4, Bui Xuan Truong3,4
1 Viet Duc University Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Hữu Nghị Việt Đức
3 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University
4 Trường Đại học Y Dược, Đại học Quốc Gia Hà Nội
Corresponding author: dr.huuthao@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD4.1173
20 Views
15 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: Penile cancer is a type of male genital cancer that has a significant impact on patients’ lives and mortality. The inguinal lymph nodes are the primary site of metastasis for penile cancer. Inguinal lymph node dissection directly affects patient prognosis and quality of life.

Content: To evaluate the clinical and paraclinical status of lymph nodes, diagnose TNM stages of penile cancer. Surgery is the main method of treating inguinal lymph nodes. Evaluate the results of open inguinal lymph node dissection and laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection.

Conclusion: Penile cancer can be cured if diagnosed early. Surgery is the main method of radical treatment by treating the primary tumor and lymph nodes, especially bilateral inguinal lymph nodes. Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy is a technique that can replace open inguinal lymph node dissection in the treatment of penile cancer.

References
[1]
Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP et al., Patients Google Scholar
[2]
with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate Google Scholar
[3]
resection of clinically occult lymph node Google Scholar
[4]
metastases. J Urol. 2005;173(3):816-819. Google Scholar
[5]
Brady KL, Mercurio MG, Brown MD, Malignant Google Scholar
[6]
tumors of the penis. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Google Scholar
[7]
Soc Dermatol Surg Al. 2013;39(4):527-547. Google Scholar
[8]
EAU Guidelines on Penile Cancer - Google Scholar
[9]
EPIDEMIOLOGY, AETIOLOGY AND Google Scholar
[10]
PATHOLOGY - Uroweb. Uroweb - European Google Scholar
[11]
Association of Urology. Accessed September Google Scholar
[13]
chapter/epidemiology-aetiology-andpathology Google Scholar
[14]
Woldu SL, Ci B, Hutchinson RC et al., Usage Google Scholar
[15]
and survival implications of surgical staging Google Scholar
[16]
of inguinal lymph nodes in intermediate- to Google Scholar
[17]
high-risk, clinical localized penile cancer: A Google Scholar
[18]
propensity-score matched analysis. Urol Oncol. Google Scholar
[19]
;36(4):159.e7-159.e17. Google Scholar
[20]
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, Google Scholar
[21]
th edition | UICC. Accessed September 9, Google Scholar
[23]
classification-malignant-tumours-8th-edition Google Scholar
[24]
Cabanas RM, Anatomy and biopsy of Google Scholar
[25]
sentinel lymph nodes. Urol Clin North Am. Google Scholar
[26]
;19(2):267-276. Google Scholar
[27]
Bevan-Thomas R, Slaton JW, Pettaway CA, Google Scholar
[28]
Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy Google Scholar
[29]
for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Google Scholar
[30]
Anderson Cancer Center Experience. J Urol. Google Scholar
[31]
;167(4):1638-1642. Google Scholar
[32]
Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Molina WR et Google Scholar
[33]
al., Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy Google Scholar
[34]
(VEIL): minimally invasive resection of inguinal Google Scholar
[35]
lymph nodes. Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Google Scholar
[36]
Urol. 2006;32(3):316-321. Google Scholar
[37]
Bada M, Crocetto F, Nyirady P et al., Inguinal Google Scholar
[38]
lymphadenectomy in penile cancer patients: a Google Scholar
[39]
comparison between open and video endoscopic Google Scholar
[40]
approach in a multicenter setting. J Basic Clin Google Scholar
[41]
Physiol Pharmacol. 2023;34(3):383-389. Google Scholar
[42]
Tobias-Machado M, Ornellas AA, Hidaka Google Scholar
[43]
AK et al., Long-term oncological and surgical Google Scholar
[44]
outcomes after Video Endoscopic Inguinal Google Scholar
[45]
Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in patients with Google Scholar
[46]
penile cancer. Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Google Scholar
[47]
Urol. 2023;49(5):580-589. Google Scholar