Articles Vol. 65 No. CĐ 4 - Hội Y học Giới tính Việt Nam 30/05/2024

7. THE RESULTS OF INTERNAL MEDICAL TREATMENT OF SEMINAL VESICULITIS AT THE CENTER FOR ANDROLOGY AND SEXUAL MEDICINE, VIETDUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FROM 2021 TO 2022

Nguyen Quang1,2,3,4, Bui Van Quang1,2,3,4, Trinh Hoang Giang1,3, Nguyen Duy Khanh1,3, Bui Xuan Truong2,4, Nguyen Thi Thu Ha1,3, Pham Thi Thu Trang1,3, Nguyen Dang Kien1,3, Vu Thi Cam Van1,3, Nguyen Thi Thao1,3
1 Viet Duc Friendship Hospital
2 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam National University
3 Bệnh viện Hữu Nghị Việt Đức
4 Đại học Y Dược, Đại học Quốc Gia Hà Nội
Corresponding author: buiquanghmu@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD4.1156
17 Views
5 Downloads
Abstract

 Objectives: This study aims to describe of the results of internal medical treatment of seminal vesiculitis at the Center for andrology and sexual medicine, Viet Duc Hospital of University.

Materials and methods: Retrospective descriptive study with longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 60 patients diagnosed with seminal vesiculitis who received outpatient medical treatment at Viet Duc Hospital of University from January 2021 to the end of June 2022.

Results: The average age of subjects was 43.5 ± 10.8 (21-67). The most common clinical symptoms were bloody ejaculation and painful ejaculation with rates of 98.33% and 40% respectively. The negative rate of urine culture was 90%. Positive semen culture results were: 16/60 (26.67%). Average follow-up time: 15.9 ± 5.4 months.

Treatment results: cure: 61.67%, relapse: 36.67%. There was stasistically significant difference regards of the treatment success rate between the positive semen culture and the negative group (p=0.01).

Conclusion: Medical treatment of seminal vesiculitis is a method that gives positive results but is also prone to recurrence. Semen culture test can be of great benefit for treatment.

References
[1]
Ibrahim D, Bell D, Seminal vesiculitis. In: Google Scholar
[2]
Radiopaedia.Org. Radiopaedia.org; 2018. Google Scholar
[3]
doi:10.53347/rID-59487 Google Scholar
[4]
Zhang P, Wang XL, Yang ZH et al., A novel rat Google Scholar
[5]
model of seminal vesiculitis. Asian J Androl. Google Scholar
[6]
;21(4):360. doi:10.4103/aja .aja_90_18 Google Scholar
[7]
Hull BL, Vogel SR, Seminal Vesiculitis. Vet Clin Google Scholar
[8]
North Am Food Anim Pract. 2008;24(2):267- Google Scholar
[9]
doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2008.02.006 Google Scholar
[10]
Andrade-Rocha FT, Unusual presentation of Google Scholar
[11]
seminal vesiculitis in an infertile man. Can J Google Scholar
[12]
Urol. 2007;14(6):3750-3752. Google Scholar
[13]
Park S, Ryu J, Choo G et al., Chronic bacterial Google Scholar
[14]
seminal vesiculitis as a potential disease entity Google Scholar
[15]
in men with chronic prostatitis. Int J Urol. Google Scholar
[16]
;22(5):508-512. doi:10.1111/iju.12706 Google Scholar
[17]
Chen R, Xu YM, Qiao Y et al., [Interventional Google Scholar
[18]
therapy for the chronic seminal vesiculitis]. Google Scholar
[19]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue Natl J Androl. Google Scholar
[20]
;8(4):281-282. Google Scholar
[21]
J Cavalieri, SD Van Camp. Bovine seminal Google Scholar
[22]
vesiculitis. A review and update. 1997;13(2):234- Google Scholar
[23]
doi:10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30337-6 Google Scholar
[24]
Zaidi S, Gandhi J, Seyam O et al., Etiology, Google Scholar
[25]
Diagnosis, and Management of Seminal Google Scholar
[26]
Vesicle Stones. Curr Urol. 2019;12(3):113-120. Google Scholar
[27]
doi:10.1159/ 000489429 Google Scholar
[28]
Dagur G, Warren K, Suh Y et al., Detecting Google Scholar
[29]
diseases of neglected seminal vesicles using Google Scholar
[30]
imaging modalities: A review of current literature. Google Scholar
[31]
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14(5):293-302. Google Scholar
[32]
White EW, Gradwohl RBH, Seminal Vesiculitis: Google Scholar
[33]
Symptoms, Differential Diagnosis, Treatment Google Scholar
[34]
and Bacteriological Studies in One Thousand Google Scholar
[35]
Cases. J Urol. 1921;6(4):303-319. doi:10.1016/ Google Scholar
[36]
S0022-5347(17)74076-1. Google Scholar