Articles Vol. 65 No. 3 06/05/2024

34. EVALUATING THE LIFE QUALITY OF RADIATION THERAPY PATIENTS AT AN ONCOLOGY HOSPITAL IN HANOI, 2023

Vu Thai Son1,2, Nguyen Minh Anh1,2
1 Hanoi University of Public Health
2 Trường Đại học Y tế công cộng
Corresponding author: vts@huph.edu.vn
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65i3.1086
33 Views
22 Downloads
Keywords
Radiation therapy, cancer, Quality of life, EORTC QLQ-C30 scale.
Abstract

Objectives: Evaluating the quality of life of radiation cancer patients at a Hanoi oncology hospital.

Methods: Utilizing the standardized EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, we assessed the quality of life for 399 cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy at two timepoints: the commencement of hospitalization and one month post-treatment. Patient quality of life is evaluated through five functional domains, each consisting of yes-no questions, 15 symptom-related questions with four rating levels (1-no symptom, 4-severe symptom), and seven questions concerning the patient’s overall well-being (1-very bad, 7-very good). The study aimed to determine the degree of radiotherapy’s impact on patients’ quality of life. Evaluation was based on the total Raw Score (RS) and converted Score (S). Higher scores indicated a greater impact.

Results: Compared to one month after treatment, most functional activities (physical, role, emotional, cognitive) and general quality of life during hospitalization exhibited higher scores. Social function, however, demonstrated a higher score post-treatment (2.59) than at admission (2.39). Fatigue, pain, and insomnia were prevalent issues among patients, with scores of 2.80, 2.66, and 2.88, respectively. The majority of patients (76.7%) reported an impact on their overall quality of life during hospitalization; this rate significantly decreased to 5% of patients one month post-treatment. Fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain were the most common symptoms during hospitalization, affecting over 50% of patients in both time periods. Other symptoms, including insomnia, anorexia, and sexual dysfunction, also displayed high incidence rates ranging from 22.5% to 98.3%.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that radiotherapy can have a significant impact on patients’ physical and emotional well-being, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care approaches that address both clinical and psychosocial aspects of treatment.

References
[1]
Li D, Prigerson HG, Kang J et al., Impact of Google Scholar
[2]
Radiation Therapy on Aggressive Care and Google Scholar
[3]
Quality of Life Near Death. J Pain Symptom Google Scholar
[4]
Manage. 2017 Jan;53(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j. Google Scholar
[5]
jpainsymman.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Oct 5. Google Scholar
[6]
PMID: 27720786; PMCID: PMC538 Google Scholar
[7]
World Health Organization, Quality of life Google Scholar
[8]
assessment: Meaning and measurement, 1996. Google Scholar
[9]
Dans M, Kutner JS, Agarwal R et al., NCCN Google Scholar
[10]
Guidelines® Insights: Palliative Care, Google Scholar
[11]
Version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. Google Scholar
[12]
Jul 28;19(7):780-788. doi: 10.6004/ Google Scholar
[13]
jnccn.2021.0033. PMID: 34340208; PMCID: Google Scholar
[14]
PMC10196810. Google Scholar
[15]
International Agency for Research on Cancer, Google Scholar
[16]
Cancer in Vietnam: Estimates for 2020 and Google Scholar
[17]
projections for 2040, 2021. Google Scholar
[18]
Davda J, Kibet H, Achieng E et al., Assessing Google Scholar
[19]
the acceptability, reliability, and validity of Google Scholar
[20]
the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Google Scholar
[21]
(QLQ-C30) in Kenyan cancer patients: a crosssectional Google Scholar
[22]
study. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Google Scholar
[23]
Jan 7;5(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00275-w. Google Scholar
[24]
PMID: 33415528; PMCID: PMC7790948. Google Scholar
[25]
Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K et al., EORTC Google Scholar
[26]
QLQ-C30 scoring manual. Brussels: EORTC Google Scholar
[27]
Publications, 1997. Google Scholar
[28]
Aaronson NK, Tveit A, Bjørndal T et al., Google Scholar
[29]
EORTC QLQ-C30: a new core questionnaire for Google Scholar
[30]
use in European clinical trials in cancer patients. Google Scholar
[31]
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1993;29(1):27–37. Doi: Google Scholar
[32]
1016/0268-3572(93)90048-4 Google Scholar
[33]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Google Scholar
[34]
(NCCN), Radiation Therapy for Cancer: Adult Google Scholar
[35]
Complete Guidelines Version 2.2021 (NCCN Google Scholar
[36]
Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology). Google Scholar
[37]
Accessed October 15, 2021. Google Scholar
[38]
Bottomley PA et al., The EORTC Quality of Google Scholar
[39]
Life Questionnaire Core Module (QLQ-C30): Google Scholar
[40]
Development of a Cancer-Specific Module for Google Scholar
[41]
Patients With Breast Cancer (QLQ-BR23). Eur Google Scholar
[42]
J Cancer Care (Emocl) 1996;5(4):357–366. Google Scholar
[43]
Doi:10.1111/j.1468-3017.1996.tb00587x Google Scholar
[44]
Schipperjes JG et al., The EORTC Quality of Google Scholar
[45]
Life Questionnaire Core Module (QLQ-C30): Google Scholar
[46]
Development of a Cancer-Specific Module for Google Scholar
[47]
Patients With Colorectal Cancer (QLQ-CR29). Google Scholar
[48]
Eur J Cancer Care (Emocl) 2002;1(4):425–435. Google Scholar
[49]
Doi:10.111/jccemocl_2_4_425 Google Scholar
[50]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Google Scholar
[51]
(NCCN), Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Google Scholar
[52]
Cancer Version 7: November 2020 - NCCN Google Scholar
[53]
Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™ Google Scholar
[54]
(NCCN Guidelines®). Accessed October 26, 2021. Google Scholar
[55]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Google Scholar
[56]
(NCCN), Financial Toxicity Version 2: Google Scholar
[57]
November 2020 - NCCN Clinical Practice Google Scholar
[58]
Guidelines in Oncology™ (NCCN Guidelines®). Google Scholar
[59]
Accessed October 26, 2021. Google Scholar
[60]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fatigue Google Scholar
[61]
Management Version 2.2021: Patient Education Google Scholar
[62]
Version 1.2021 Accessed April 26th 2021 Google Scholar