Articles Vol. 65 No. 3 06/05/2024

22. QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS IN THONG NHAT HOSPITAL, HO CHI MINH CITY 2023

Chanthavisouk Ketsana1,2, Nguyen Van Pol1,2, Le Nhat Phuong3,4, Pham Thi Hong Ha5,6, Vo Van Bay1,2
1 Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine
2 Trường Đại học Y khoa Phạm Ngọc Thạch
3 Duy Tan University
4 Trường Đại học Duy Tân
5 Thong Nhat Hospital, Ho Chi Minh city
6 Bệnh viện Thống Nhất, Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
Corresponding author: bayvv@pnt.edu.vn
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65i3.1073
31 Views
21 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To describe QWL and explore some associated factors QWL of healthcare workers at Thong Nhat Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City.

Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with healthcare workers by using “Work-related quality of life scale-2” (WRQoL-2) scale with seven aspects including 32 questions. This study applied ANOVA to test for differences.

Results: A total of 307 healthcare workers participated in the survey. Healthcare workers aged 30 - 39 accounted for the highest 45.9%. Female healthcare workers accounted for 77.2%. Among the seven domains, the highest score is “Job and career satisfaction” (3.58 ± 0.62), followed by “Employee engagement” (3.56 ± 0.71), “Working conditions” (3.41 ± 0.73), “Home-work interface” and “Control at work” (3.34 ± 0.79). The domain with the lowest average score is “Stress at work” (2.82 ± 0.62). The variables of age group, sex, marital status, education level, job title, and number of dependents significantly influenced WRQoL (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The WRQoL-2 scale is suitable for assessing WRQoL of healthcare workers. Policymakers should pay attention to personal characteristics and job title to improve WRQoL of healthcare workers.

References
[1]
CV MV, MSP Meenakshi, K Ravichandran, Google Scholar
[2]
Quality of work life-the need of the hour. Google Scholar
[3]
International Journal of Business and Google Scholar
[4]
Management Invention, 2013. 2: p. 01-04. Google Scholar
[5]
Moradi T, F Maghaminejad, I Azizi-Fini, Quality Google Scholar
[6]
of working life of nurses and its related factors. Google Scholar
[7]
Nurs Midwifery Stud, 2014. 3(2): p. e19450. Google Scholar
[8]
Gaffar NA et al., Work-related Quality of Life Google Scholar
[9]
and Its Associated Factors Among House Google Scholar
[10]
Officers Working at Two Hospitals in Selangor. Google Scholar
[11]
Malaysian Journal of Medicine & Health Google Scholar
[12]
Sciences, 2021. 17(2). Google Scholar
[13]
Raeissi P et al., Quality of work life and factors Google Scholar
[14]
associated with it among nurses in public Google Scholar
[15]
hospitals, Iran. Journal of the Egyptian Public Google Scholar
[16]
Health Association, 2019. 94: p. 1-8. Google Scholar
[17]
Vu TQ et al., Quality of Work Life in Healthcare: Google Scholar
[18]
A Comparison of Medical Representatives and Google Scholar
[19]
Hospital Pharmacists. Hospital Topics, 2021. Google Scholar
[20]
(4): p. 161-170. Google Scholar
[21]
Nguyen-Hoang N, TQ Vo, Quality of working life Google Scholar
[22]
among pharmacists in Vietnam: A preliminary Google Scholar
[23]
study using an internet-based survey. Journal of Google Scholar
[24]
Clinical and Diagnostic RESEARCH, 2018. 12: Google Scholar
[25]
[26]
Lin S et al., Preliminary psychometric properties Google Scholar
[27]
of the chinese version of the work-related quality Google Scholar
[28]
of life scale-2 in the nursing profession. Saf Google Scholar
[29]
Health Work, 2013. 4(1): p. 37-45. Google Scholar
[30]
Martel JP, G Dupuis, Quality of work life: Google Scholar
[31]
Theoretical and methodological problems, and Google Scholar
[32]
presentation of a new model and measuring Google Scholar
[33]
instrument. Social indicators research, 2006, Google Scholar
[34]
(2): p. 333-368. Google Scholar
[35]
Mayo E, The human problems of an industrial Google Scholar
[36]
civilization. 2004: Routledge. Google Scholar
[37]
Hu H et al., Current status and influencing factors Google Scholar
[38]
of the quality of work life of nurses in intensive Google Scholar
[39]
care unit. Yangtze Medicine, 2020. 4(03): p. 183. Google Scholar