Articles Vol. 65 No. CĐ 2 - NCKH 08/04/2024

26. THE RATE OF WOUND INFECTION AFTER THE USE OF ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN CESAREAN SECTION AT THAI NGUYEN GENERAL HOSPITAL IN 2022

Nguyen Thi Anh1,2, Vu Van Hiep1,2, Ngo Toan Anh3,4, Doan Thi Hue1,2
1 Thai Nguyen University Medicine and Phacmacy
2 Trường Đại học Y Dược Thái Nguyên
3 National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology
4 Bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD2.1030
24 Views
17 Downloads
Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to describe clinical and sub-clinical characteristics of C-section patients after using of antibiotic prophylaxis at Thai Nguyen General Hospital in 2022.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study with 184 caesarean section patients was randomly selected from July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022.

Results: The average age is 28.36±5.0 years old, the was 88.6% in the age group ≤ 35 years old. Most women give birth for the second or third time, accounting for a high rate of 76.1% and 13.6%. The majority of pregnant women with a history of cesarean section had a cesarean section at 84.2%. Most women give birth for the second or third time, accounting for a high rate of 76.1% and 13.6%. A previous C-section was the most frequent indication at 84.2%. Most surgery times were from 30-60 minutes 95.7%. There were 2 cases of patients with fever after surgery, with temperatures ranging from 37.50C-38.5°C were 1.1%. There were 99.5% of cases with good uterine involution. All pregnant women in the study had normal post-operative lochia. The rate of dry incisions was 98.4%, incision swelling and pain was 0.5%, and incisions with dressing seepage was 1.1%. There were 05 cases of hospitalization for 7 days or more was 2.7%. There were 03 cases of superficial surgical wound infection, accounting for 1.6% and 98.4% of cases had no surgical wound infection.

Conclusion: Using minimal doses of prophylactic antibiotics reduces the rate of surgical wound infection after cesarean section.

References
[1]
Bộ Y tế, Quyết định số 1526/QĐ-BYT ngày Google Scholar
[2]
/3/2023 về việc ban hành hướng dẫn giám sát Google Scholar
[3]
nhiễm khuẩn vết mổ, 2023. Google Scholar
[4]
Bộ Y tế, Quyết định số 4128/QĐ-BYT, ngày Google Scholar
[5]
/7/2016 Bộ Y tế ban hành về việc Phê duyệt tài Google Scholar
[6]
liệu “Hướng dẫn quốc gia về các dịch vụ chăm Google Scholar
[7]
sóc sức khỏe sinh sản”, 2016. Google Scholar
[8]
Lê Thị Thu Hà, Yếu tố nguy cơ nhiễm khuẩn vết Google Scholar
[9]
mổ sau mổ lấy thai tại Bệnh viện Từ Dũ; Y học Google Scholar
[10]
Việt Nam. 2(443), 2016, p. 9-13. Google Scholar
[11]
Nguyễn Thị Kim Thu, Nguyễn Thị Hương Ly, Google Scholar
[12]
Đánh giá tình trạng nhiễm khuẩn vết mổ lấy thai Google Scholar
[13]
tại Khoa Sản, Bệnh viện Trung ương Quân đội Google Scholar
[14]
; Tạp chí Y Dược lâm sàng 108, 16(4), 2021. Google Scholar
[15]
Trịnh Thanh Nhung, Phạm Hồng Loan, Nguyễn Google Scholar
[16]
Hoàng Huy và cộng sự, Đánh giá hiệu quả kháng Google Scholar
[17]
sinh dự phòng trong mổ lấy thai tại Bệnh viện đa Google Scholar
[18]
khoa khu vực tỉnh An Giang; Hội nghị Khoa học Google Scholar
[19]
Công nghệ; p. 167-173, 2016. Google Scholar
[20]
Mariska NSRD, Danti NI, Rebekah JS, The Effect Google Scholar
[21]
of Pre-Operating Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Post Google Scholar
[22]
C-Section Infection In RSUD DR. Soetomo Google Scholar
[23]
Period January 2021 – June 2021. International Google Scholar
[24]
Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR); Google Scholar
[25]
(1), 2021. Google Scholar
[26]
Williams MJ, Carvalho Ribeiro do Valle C, Google Scholar
[27]
Gyte GM, Different classes of antibiotics given Google Scholar
[28]
to women routinely for preventing infection at Google Scholar
[29]
caesarean section. The Cochrane database of Google Scholar
[30]
systematic reviews, 3(3), pp. CD008726, 2021. Google Scholar
[31]
Zejnullahu VA, R Isjanovska, Z Sejfija et al., Google Scholar
[32]
Surgical site infections after cesarean sections at Google Scholar
[33]
the University Clinical Center of Kosovo: rates, Google Scholar
[34]
microbiological profile and risk factors. BMC Google Scholar
[35]
Infect Dis. 19(1): p. 752, 2019. Google Scholar