Articles Vol. 65 No. CĐ 2 - NCKH 08/04/2024

6. CURRENT STATUS OF USING SIMULATION METHODS AND EVALUATION OF LECTURERS IN NURSING PRACTICAL TEACHING AT VINH MEDICAL UNIVERSITY IN 2023

Dinh Thi Hang Nga1,2
1 Vinh Medical University
2 Trường Đại học Y khoa Vinh
Corresponding author: ngadinh.dhykvinh@gmail.com
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v65iCD2.1010
14 Views
8 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: Describe the current situation of using simulation methods and evaluation of lecturers in nursing practical teaching at Vinh Medical University 2023.

Research method: Descriptive research conducted on 28 teachers participating in training nursing students at Vinh Medical University from May to November 2023 by interviewing through the questionnaire tool.

Results: Teachers often use the simulation method with a fixed structure, simulation based on anatomical models accounts for a high rate of 42.9%, 39.3% respectively. The teaching time of 1 case of practice at campus long over 180 minutes, accounting for the highest rate of 25%, and the time of teaching 1 case of practice at a practice facility long from 46 to 90 minutes, accounting for the highest rate of 25%. The level of interest and very interest in the simulation method are both very high (> 85%). The percentage of teachers who regularly apply “Assessment of attitude communication skills” is 62.3% and “Evaluate by pure recall theory questions” is 46.4%. Teachers are interested in student assessment methods at over 75%, of which the highest is “Evaluating thinking using hypothetical situations” accounting for 78.6%.

Conclusion: Teachers often use simulation method with fixed structure, simulation based on anatomical model. Teachers are interested in simulation methods with fixed structures, simulation based on anatomical models, computer-based simulation, virtual patient-based simulation, real patients simulation, simulation using standard patients. Teachers are interested in student assessment methods, the highest of which is “Evaluating thinking using hypothetical situations”.

References
[1]
Ironside PM, McNelis AM, Clinical education Google Scholar
[2]
in prelicensure nursing programs: findings from Google Scholar
[3]
a national survey. Nurs Educ Perspect, 2010, Google Scholar
[4]
(4): 264-26. Google Scholar
[5]
Sherrod D, Roberts D, Little B, Where Have The Google Scholar
[6]
New Grads Gone? Nursing Management. The Google Scholar
[7]
Journal of Excellence in Nursing Leadership, Google Scholar
[8]
, 39(12): 8-12. Google Scholar
[9]
Hayden J, Use of simulation in nursing education: Google Scholar
[10]
National survey results. Journal of Nursing Google Scholar
[11]
Regulation, 2010, 1(3): 52-57. Google Scholar
[12]
Blum CA, Borglund S, Parcells D, High-fidelity Google Scholar
[13]
nursing simulation: Impact on student selfconfidence Google Scholar
[14]
and clinical competence. International Google Scholar
[15]
Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 2010, Google Scholar
[16]
(1), Article 18. Google Scholar
[17]
Valizadeh L, Amini A, Fathi-Azar E et al., The Google Scholar
[18]
Effect of Simulation Teaching on Baccalaureate Google Scholar
[19]
Nursing Students’ Self-confidence Related to Google Scholar
[20]
Peripheral Venous Catheterization in Children: Google Scholar
[21]
A Randomized Trial. Journal of Caring Google Scholar
[22]
Sciences, 2013, 2(2): 157–164. Google Scholar
[23]
National League for Nursing. Simulation Google Scholar
[24]
Innovation Resource Center. https://www.nln. Google Scholar
[25]
org/education/education/sirc/sirc/sirc. Accessed Google Scholar
[26]
[27]
WHO, Simulation in nursing and midwifery Google Scholar
[28]
education. Publications of the WHO Regional Google Scholar
[29]
Office for Europe; 2018 Google Scholar
[30]
Mai Thị Lan Anh, Kết quả ứng dụng phương Google Scholar
[31]
pháp mô phỏng trong đào tạo cử nhân điều dưỡng Google Scholar
[32]
tại trường Đại học điều dưỡng Nam Định, Tạp Google Scholar
[33]
chí Khoa học điều dưỡng, 2020, 1(1): 101-108. Google Scholar