Articles Vol. 67 No. 8 25/08/2026

FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS AFTER PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION FIXATION FOR INTERTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURES

Vi Van Duong1,2, Vi Van Duong1,2, Vo Van Man1,2
1 South Saigon International General Hospital
2 Bệnh viện Đa khoa quốc tế nam Sài Gòn
DOI: 10.52163/yhc.v67i8.6358
30 Views
0 Downloads
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate hip functional outcomes using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and to investigate associations between selected clinical factors, fracture characteristics, radiographic features, and functional outcomes in patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation fixation.

Subjects and methods: This descriptive retrospective-prospective study included 36 patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures who underwent surgical fixation using proximal femoral nail antirotation. HHS was assessed at the 6-month postoperative follow-up and compared according to age, sex, comorbidities, mechanism of injury, AO fracture classification, and selected radiographic characteristics. The t-test, ANOVA, Chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test was used as appropriate, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: The Harris Hip Score differed significantly according to age group and sex in univariate analysis. The mean HHS showed a decreasing trend with increasing age, from 94.71 ± 3.68 in patients aged <50 years to 75.50 ± 3.53 in patients aged ≥90 years, p < 0.001. Male patients had a higher mean HHS than female patients, 91.87 ± 3.44 versus 86.23 ± 9.36, respectively, p = 0.013. No statistically significant association was observed between HHS and comorbidities, mechanism of injury, AO fracture classification, or the radiographic characteristics assessed. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the small sample size and sparse subgroups.

Conclusion: In this study, age and sex were significantly associated with HHS in univariate analysis. No statistically significant association was observed between HHS and comorbidities, mechanism of injury, AO fracture classification, or the assessed radiographic characteristics.

References
[1]
Nguyễn DK, Đào XT, Ma NT. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị gãy xương vùng mấu chuyển xương đùi bằng đinh PFNA tại Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2025;546(1):179-182. doi:10.51298/vmj.v546i1.12522 Google Scholar
[2]
Võ Thành Toàn, Phan Ngọc Tùng, Nguyễn Bảo Lục. Kết quả điều trị gãy liên mấu chuyển xương đùi bằng đinh PFNA không dùng bàn chỉnh hình tại Bệnh viện Thống Nhất. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2023;530(1):19-22. doi:10.51298/vmj.v530i1.6560 Google Scholar
[3]
Murugan PB, Mohan S, Pradeep E, et al. Comparison of functional and radiological outcome of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated using PFN and PFNA in patients with osteoporosis. Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports. 2024;14(10). doi:10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i10.4870 Google Scholar
[4]
Phạm Nguyễn Trọng Nguyên, Đào Xuân Thành, Đỗ Hùng Giang. Kết quả điều trị gãy vùng mấu chuyển xương đùi bằng đinh nội tủy đóng kín tại Bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2024;543(2):309-313. Google Scholar
[5]
Phruetthiphat O-a, Pinijprapa P, Satravaha Y, Kitcharanant N, Pongchaiyakul C. An innovative scoring system for predicting an excellent Harris hip score after proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture. Scientific Reports. 2022/11/19 2022;12(1):19939. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-24177-7 Google Scholar
[6]
Lê Xuân Sơn. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị gãy liên mấu chuyển xương đùi ở người trên 65 tuổi bằng đinh PFNA tại Bệnh viện Sài Gòn ITO. Tạp chí Y học Cộng đồng. 2024;65(CĐ 1 - Liên chi hội Phẫu thuật bàn tay):113-120. doi:10.52163/yhc.v65iCD1.974 Google Scholar
[7]
Tang Y, Wang D, Wang L, et al. The PFNA in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with or without lateral wall fracture in elderly patients: a retrospective cohort study. European Journal of Medical Research. 2023/09/27 2023;28(1):380. doi:10.1186/s40001-023-01332-y Google Scholar