OUTCOMES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR PERINEAL ENDOMETRIOSIS AT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

Nguyen Tran Chung1, Phan Thu Hang1
1 Hanoi Medical University

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment for perineal endometriosis (PE) at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Methods: A descriptive study was conducted, collecting data from the medical records of patients diagnosed with PE who underwent surgery at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology between January 2018 and August 2022. Inclusion criteria comprised patients diagnosed with PE who had undergone surgery, had histopathological confirmation of endometriosis, and whose records contained sufficient information. Patients with systemic diseases and/or histopathological results other than endometriosis were excluded. Pain severity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0–10). Quality of life was evaluated using the SF-36 and classified as poor (0–25), moderate (26–75), or good (76–100).


Results: A total of 48 patients were included in the analysis; the mean age was 31 ± 7.18 years (range, 20–43). The mean BMI was 19.74 ± 2.14 (range, 15.3–26.1), with the majority having a BMI of 18.5 to <23 (77.1%). Postoperatively, wound infection occurred in 3/48 cases, and no major surgical complications were recorded. Before surgery, 43/48 patients had NRS scores ≥4 (89.6%); at three months postoperatively, all 48 patients had NRS scores of 1–3 (100%). During follow-up based on records, 2/48 patients experienced recurrence at the perineum. Regarding quality of life (n=26), the proportion of patients with a “good” SF-36 rating increased from 11.6% before treatment to 84.6% at three months and 92.3% at ≥6 months postoperatively.


Conclusion: Surgical treatment for perineal endometriosis demonstrated clear effectiveness in pain reduction and improvement of quality of life, with a low rate of wound infection and a small recurrence rate.

Chi tiết bài viết

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] Lousse, J.-C., A. Van Langendonckt, S. Defrere, et al. (2012). Peritoneal endometriosis is an inflammatory disease. Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite, 4(1), 23-40.
[2] Zhu, L., J. Lang, H. Wang, et al. (2009). Presentation and management of perineal endometriosis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 105(3), 230-232.
[3] Collinet, P., X. Fritel, C. Revel-Delhom, et al. (2018). Management of endometriosis: CNGOF/HAS clinical practice guidelines – Short version. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 47(7), 265-274.
[4] Farquhar, C., I. Brosens (2006). Medical and surgical management of adenomyosis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 20(4), 603-616.
[5] Chen, N., L. Zhu, J. Lang, et al. (2012). The clinical features and management of perineal endometriosis with anal sphincter involvement: a clinical analysis of 31 cases. Human Reproduction, 27(6), 1624-1627.
[6] Maillard, C., Z. Cherif Alami, J.-L. Squifflet, et al. (2021). Diagnosis and treatment of vulvo-perineal endometriosis: a systematic review. Frontiers in Surgery, 8, 637180.
[7] Matalliotakis, M., C. Matalliotaki, M.I. Zervou, et al. (2020). Abdominal and perineal scar endometriosis: Retrospective study on 40 cases. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 252, 225-227.