Article Sidebar

Published: 2026-07-31
Abstract Views: 18
DOI: https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v67iCD11.6043
Issue
Vol. 67 No. CĐ11-NCKH
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Hiên, T. T., & Dũng, N. N. (2026). THE AGREEMENT OF SELECTED PERIPHERAL BLOOD CELL PARAMETERS BETWEEN THE AUTOMATED HEMATOLOGY ANALYZERS DXH 900 AND XN 10 AT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEMATOLOGY AND BLOOD TRANSFUSION. Vietnam Journal of Community Medicine, 67(CĐ11-NCKH). https://doi.org/10.52163/yhc.v67iCD11.6043

THE AGREEMENT OF SELECTED PERIPHERAL BLOOD CELL PARAMETERS BETWEEN THE AUTOMATED HEMATOLOGY ANALYZERS DXH 900 AND XN 10 AT NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEMATOLOGY AND BLOOD TRANSFUSION

Truong Thi Hien1, Nguyen Ngoc Dung1
1 National Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: Comparison of the results of Several Peripheral Blood Cell Analysis Tests on the DXH 900 and XN-10 automated hematology system at the National Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion in 2025.


Methods: A cross-sectional method. 80 blood specimens. Samples were analyzed on both DxH 900 and XN 10 analyzers to compare white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count (PLT), red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), and mean corpuscular volume (MCV), following the CLSI EP09-C guidelines.


Results: All evaluated parameters (WBC, PLT, RBC, HGB, and MCV) demonstrated strong correlation (R > 0.99). Outcome A was observed for PLT (bias −2.4%) and RBC (bias 0.1%) between the two analyzers. Outcome B was identified for WBC (bias −2.0%), HGB (bias 3.4%), and MCV (bias 0.6%). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for all parameters exceeded 0.9.


Conclusion: The WBC, PLT, RBC, HGB, and MCV tests performed on the DXH 900 and XN 10 analyzers demonstrated good agreement.

Article Details

Keywords

Comparison, correlation, bias, CLSI EP09-C.

References

1. R. D. Nerenz, M. E. Pittman, and M. Scott, "Impact of errors and variability on clinical laboratory test interpretation," in Pathobiology of Human Disease: A Dynamic Encyclopedia of Disease Mechanisms, ed Elsevier Inc., 2014, pp. 3222-3236. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-386456-7.06303-6
2. J. Budd, A. Durham, T. Gwise, D. Hawkins, M. Holland, B. Iriarte, et al., "CLSI EP09-C, Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation using Patient Samples– Approved Guideline," 2018.
3. ISO 15189:2022, "Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality and competence, International standard," ed, 2022.
4. E. E. F. o. C. C. a. L. Medicine. Available: https://biologicalvariation.eu/
5. T. K. Koo and M. Y. Li, "A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research," J Chiropr Med, vol. 15, pp. 155-63, Jun 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
6. J. Wang, S. Zhao, Z. Su, and X. Liu, "Analytical comparison between two hematological analyzer systems: Mindray BC-5180 vs Sysmex XN-1000," J Clin Lab Anal, vol. 33, p. e22955, Oct 2019. DOI: org/10.1002/jcla.22955
7. M. Serrando Querol, J. Nieto-Moragas, A. Marull Arnall, M. D. Figueras, and O. Jiménez-Romero, "Evaluation of the new Beckmann Coulter analyzer DXH 900 compared to SYSMEX XN20: analytical performance and flagging efficiency," Diagnostics, vol. 11, p. 1756, 2021. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11101756
8. K. Fujimaki, K. Hummel, I. Magonde, K. Dammert, Y. Hamaguchi, K. Mintzas, et al., "Performance evaluation of the new Sysmex XR-Series haematology analyser," Practical laboratory medicine, vol. 39, p. e00370, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00370